The future of US Fencing is at stake!

For transparency, fairness, and athlete support, VOTE NOW for:
(1) Maria Panyi, (2) Andrey Geva, (3) Igor Chirashnya, and (4) Sue Moheb.

Morris Cup Spring RYC/RJCC

Y-14 Men's Saber

Sunday, March 19, 2023 at 4:00 PM

SportsPlex at Metuchen - Metuchen, NJ, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 MEHAN Nicholas - - - 1% 7% 33% 60%
2 CHUNG Connor - - 1% 7% 24% 40% 27%
3 BERA Enzo - - 1% 9% 28% 41% 20%
3 LIU Kevin - - 1% 7% 24% 41% 28%
5 KIM ELIJAH - - 1% 5% 20% 42% 33%
6 AYDOGDU Hakan - 5% 22% 37% 28% 8% -
7 SAGE Sebastian - - 4% 18% 38% 33% 6%
8 NGO Maximus - 3% 14% 32% 34% 15% 2%
9 LIN Maxim - - 1% 7% 27% 44% 20%
10 ATWOOD Griffin - - 3% 15% 34% 34% 13%
11 WITCZAK Mateus - 1% 9% 35% 46% 9%
12 BRANDT Jaden - - 1% 8% 27% 42% 22%
13 LEE Andrew - 1% 12% 35% 38% 14%
14 KIM Ethan - - - 3% 26% 71%
15 PINTO Marcus - 1% 10% 27% 36% 21% 4%
16 BUIKEVICH Ihnat - 1% 8% 23% 36% 25% 7%
17 NGUYEN Anthony - - 1% 8% 30% 42% 19%
18 KATZ Ryan - - - 2% 15% 42% 41%
19 NOTOPRADONO Nicholas - 5% 21% 38% 28% 7%
20 LIN Philip T. - - 2% 15% 38% 35% 9%
21 CLARK Aram - - - 3% 18% 43% 36%
22 DOMINIQUE Remson - - 3% 17% 39% 32% 8%
23 WANG Weiyun - 1% 9% 27% 36% 22% 5%
24 FADEL Alexander - 1% 11% 32% 39% 16%
25 CHEN Samuel - 1% 7% 26% 42% 24%
26 CHEN Jonathan - - 1% 14% 37% 36% 12%
27 TSAO Oliver - 2% 10% 27% 36% 21% 4%
28 BONETTI Brayden - - 2% 10% 31% 42% 15%
29 MCDONALD Finn 1% 5% 18% 32% 29% 13% 2%
30 LAUB William 1% 6% 20% 32% 28% 12% 2%
31 BADUSHOV Anton - 4% 20% 37% 29% 9% 1%
32 UEMOTO Ken - 2% 11% 29% 36% 19% 3%
33 ZHAO Lucas - - 4% 16% 34% 34% 13%
34 SALDARINI Glenn - - 1% 12% 35% 38% 14%
35 OLOUGHLIN Quin 1% 9% 31% 37% 19% 4% -
36 YOOK Isaac - - 6% 31% 40% 20% 3%
37 SHAH Sohan 5% 21% 35% 27% 10% 2% -
38 PORTER Dupree 1% 8% 26% 36% 23% 7% 1%
39 SUBA Lucas - 3% 15% 35% 35% 13%
40 MUNJULURI ruhaan 5% 34% 43% 16% 2% -
41 KUMAR Arjun - 8% 33% 38% 18% 3%
42 HO Nathaniel 1% 9% 25% 33% 23% 8% 1%
42 TSATSAS Andreas 34% 42% 19% 4% - - -
44 TAN Vick 1% 13% 32% 33% 16% 4% -
45 PAVLENISHVILI Luke 8% 31% 38% 19% 4% - -
46 ZHAO Royce 2% 13% 31% 33% 17% 4% -
47 BROENING-CHAI Jonas - 1% 7% 25% 38% 24% 4%
48 KIARA Kinoti 1% 8% 27% 36% 22% 6% 1%
49 KOGAN Yelisey L. - 2% 14% 36% 36% 12%
50 TSAO Alister 21% 41% 29% 8% 1% -
51 RAJMOHAN Arya - 3% 18% 40% 30% 9% 1%
52 PRIEUR Christian F. 4% 22% 37% 27% 9% 1% -
53 DEELY Hartigan 1% 8% 27% 38% 21% 5% -
54 SUN Andrew 1% 11% 29% 34% 19% 5% -
55 MAN Landen - 3% 13% 29% 33% 18% 3%
56 TSAI Kai-An (Kash) 44% 40% 13% 2% - - -
57 WELSTEAD Nicholas - 6% 22% 35% 26% 9% 1%
58 LIN Justin 7% 33% 46% 13% 1% - -
59 LIM Brandon 3% 15% 30% 31% 16% 4% -
59 DE SIENA Salvatore 1% 11% 30% 34% 18% 4% -
61 SAKAYEDA Jacob 9% 30% 37% 19% 5% 1% -
62 FRANCO James 65% 30% 4% - - -
63 LEE Matthew 2% 14% 30% 31% 17% 5% -
64 CAFFREY Ethan 49% 39% 11% 1% - - -
65 DOSTAL Maximilian - 4% 25% 48% 21% 1%
66 ANSARI Umayr 7% 26% 37% 23% 6% 1% -
67 BALE ATMAN 2% 18% 38% 30% 11% 1% -
68 DIGIACOMO Dennis G. 17% 36% 30% 13% 3% - -
69 CHEA Caden 28% 42% 24% 6% 1% - -
70 CHANG Timothy 7% 28% 37% 22% 6% 1% -
70 JIANG Terence 66% 29% 5% - - - -
70 SHEYNZON Benjamin 17% 44% 31% 7% 1% - -
73 JAIN Karanvir 5% 26% 42% 22% 5% - -
74 SAYAR Luke 9% 31% 37% 19% 4% -
75 FIROOZI Sam 63% 32% 5% - - -
76 BAI Evan 1% 8% 26% 36% 23% 6% 1%
77 KUMAR Avinash 6% 26% 36% 23% 8% 1% -
78 MILLET Etienne 29% 48% 21% 2% - - -
79 KETT Richard 11% 51% 30% 7% 1% -
80 CRAWFORD William 6% 36% 43% 15% 2% -
81 COGLIANO Max 12% 35% 35% 15% 3% -
82 GORDON Samuel 3% 21% 38% 28% 9% 1% -
82 LEE John 8% 33% 36% 18% 4% 1% -
82 ROYCHOUDHURY Aniket 33% 42% 20% 5% 1% - -
82 HAYTER Henry 2% 17% 36% 31% 11% 2% -
86 LI Aidan 2% 14% 32% 33% 15% 3% -
87 KAPOOR Krish 41% 44% 13% 1% - - -
88 O’LOUGHLIN Jacob 33% 48% 17% 1% - - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.