Ontario Convention Center, Hall A & B - Ontario, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LEE KWANGHU | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 16% | |
| 2 | YANG Steve | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 45% | |
| 3 | SUN Roy | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 40% | 8% | |
| 3 | TURBAT Travis | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 24% | 4% |
| 5 | FOO Kingston | 100% | 98% | 80% | 42% | 9% | < 1% | |
| 6 | ZHANG Aiden | 100% | 99% | 88% | 60% | 25% | 5% | - |
| 7 | TSUI Kaylan Ho Sen | 100% | 98% | 83% | 48% | 13% | 1% | |
| 8 | HUANG Owen | 100% | 97% | 80% | 44% | 12% | 1% | |
| 9 | WU Vincent Moxiao | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 36% | 6% | |
| 10 | NGUYEN Norris | 100% | 25% | 3% | - | < 1% | - | |
| 11 | ZHANG William | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 34% | |
| 12 | TAN Benjamin | 100% | 92% | 61% | 19% | 2% | - | |
| 13 | EVANS Desmond | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 26% |
| 14 | WANG Eason | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 34% | 3% | |
| 15 | KAJITA Grayson | 100% | 98% | 84% | 45% | 10% | 1% | |
| 16 | PARK Avan | 100% | 92% | 66% | 30% | 8% | 1% | |
| 17 | LIN Stewart | 100% | 77% | 36% | 9% | 1% | < 1% | |
| 18 | WU Gengze (Daniel) | 100% | 69% | 26% | 5% | < 1% | - | |
| 19 | MAZAHERI John | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 28% | 5% | |
| 20 | TROYANKER Makar | 100% | 93% | 69% | 34% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 21 | DULAI Hukam | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 45% | 11% | |
| 22 | LAM Lazarus | 100% | 92% | 60% | 20% | 2% | - | |
| 23 | CREMEL Remi | 100% | 97% | 76% | 39% | 10% | 1% | |
| 24 | FATTAL Leo | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 29% | |
| 25 | LIU Michael | 100% | 65% | 23% | 4% | - | - | |
| 26 | LU Brandon | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 27 | YU Jinyuan | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 17% | 2% | |
| 28 | MENG Andy | 100% | 71% | 29% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 29 | SHENOY Neil | 100% | 87% | 53% | 20% | 4% | - | |
| 30 | YIN Luke | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 21% | 4% |
| 31 | YAO Oliver | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 34% | 7% | |
| 32 | ZHANG Bosen | 100% | 82% | 44% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 33 | WANG Eavan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 38% | 4% | |
| 34 | FOLOMEEV Dmitrii | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 33% | |
| 35 | CONNER Malcolm | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 14% | |
| 36 | JI Dylan | 100% | 90% | 56% | 19% | 3% | - | |
| 37 | LIU Kingston | 100% | 91% | 61% | 24% | 5% | - | |
| 38 | PENG Max | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 45% | 5% | |
| 39 | ZIN Raymond | 100% | 100% | 93% | 66% | 24% | 3% | |
| 40 | BAGWELL Theodore | 100% | 100% | 96% | 73% | 31% | 5% | |
| 41 | LOZANO Koen Alexander | 100% | 88% | 46% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 42 | ZHANG Benjamin | 100% | 99% | 90% | 56% | 17% | 2% | |
| 43 | CHANG Owen | 100% | 99% | 69% | 24% | 4% | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.