Madison, NJ - Madison, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | ELSISSY Ziad A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 77% |
| 2 | LOSS Geoffrey M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 41% |
| 3 | NADILE Henry V. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 56% | 15% |
| 3 | BASALYGA Jeffrey | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 61% | 22% | |
| 5 | RAMPAZZO Luca | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 66% | 26% | 4% |
| 6 | REN Junming | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 37% |
| 7 | MICHELL Bailey | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 15% | 1% |
| 8 | WIND Nicky E. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 45% | 13% | 1% |
| 9 | SMITH David C. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 29% | 5% | |
| 10 | GANTA Vijay | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 11 | SHI Andrew | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 42% | 11% | |
| 12 | YEN Darren | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 58% | 17% | |
| 13 | ZU Kevin | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 24% | 4% | - |
| 14 | WOOD Elden S. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 35% | 7% | |
| 15 | SO Hananiah | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 40% | 10% | |
| 16 | FRISHMAN Ethan J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 20% | 1% |
| 17 | KIM Minwook | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 28% | |
| 18 | WUN William | 100% | 96% | 75% | 39% | 11% | 1% | |
| 19 | RAI Avin | 100% | 97% | 79% | 43% | 12% | 1% | |
| 20 | BARNETT Adam | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 40% | 10% | |
| 21 | QUAN Nicholas | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 30% | 6% | |
| 22 | WU Mengke | 100% | 95% | 71% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 23 | HAZLE-CARY Jacob P. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 54% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 24 | GILES Jeremy M. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 45% | 10% | |
| 25 | LIU Kelly | 100% | 97% | 80% | 42% | 11% | 1% | |
| 26 | YEN Preston | 100% | 95% | 72% | 36% | 10% | 1% | |
| 27 | CZAHA Balint | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 36% | 8% | |
| 28 | BUKOWSKI Bronson | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 39% | 9% | |
| 29 | LIN William | 100% | 86% | 49% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 30 | LEE Jude H. | 100% | 59% | 17% | 2% | - | - | |
| 31 | TALAAT Mohamed | 100% | 91% | 63% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 32 | BARTOLO Domenic V. | 100% | 95% | 72% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 33 | EPSTEIN Henry N. | 100% | 85% | 42% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 34 | QIU Le | 100% | 96% | 78% | 43% | 14% | 2% | |
| 35 | MIKA Casper | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 28% | |
| 36 | NG Jonathan H. | 100% | 95% | 72% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 37 | NATANOV David I. | 100% | 94% | 69% | 32% | 8% | 1% | |
| 38 | HUANG Eric | 100% | 84% | 46% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 39 | ZHOU Miles | 100% | 84% | 47% | 15% | 3% | - | |
| 40 | HONG Vincent Q. | 100% | 88% | 48% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 41 | CHO Brandon | 100% | 100% | 93% | 68% | 31% | 6% | |
| 42 | TAKEMARU Leo | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 45% | 12% | 1% |
| 43 | TANG Brendan J. | 100% | 95% | 65% | 26% | 5% | - | |
| 44 | MESHKOV Peter A. | 100% | 79% | 39% | 11% | 2% | - | |
| 45 | CHAN Matthew | 100% | 95% | 74% | 37% | 9% | 1% | |
| 46 | MILGRAM Nathan A. | 100% | 59% | 18% | 3% | - | - | |
| 47 | FISK Ethan | 100% | 55% | 13% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 48 | TRAVERS Samir T. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 34% | 8% | 1% |
| 49 | BRAR Sanjeet | 100% | 94% | 68% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 50 | CZYZEWSKI Konrad R. | 100% | 97% | 79% | 45% | 14% | 2% | |
| 51 | XU Michael | 100% | 75% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.