Madison, NJ - Madison, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | TOLBA Salma | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 29% |
2 | TEMIRYAEV Anna M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 41% | |
3 | LU Junyao | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 39% |
3 | SAM Kayli | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 30% | 7% | 1% |
5 | GOLDEN Danielle | 100% | 90% | 60% | 24% | 5% | - | |
6 | DESAI Meera P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 59% | 19% |
7 | PERALTA-VIRTUE Kamilla M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 48% | 11% |
8 | SMUK Daria A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 39% | 9% |
9 | GU Sarah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 33% |
10 | GUMAGAY Erika L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 45% | 12% |
11 | SAAL Anna | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 73% | 33% | 6% |
12 | PAN Michelle | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 42% | 10% |
13 | RIST Rebecca (Beck) J. | 100% | 97% | 78% | 40% | 10% | 1% | - |
14 | ALVIDREZ Francesca A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 50% | 12% |
15 | ROWLAND May | 100% | 91% | 62% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - |
16 | OAKE Erica | 100% | 96% | 77% | 42% | 12% | 1% | |
17 | BROWN Amanda | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 76% | 42% | 11% |
18 | WU Fan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 61% | 21% |
19 | HODGES Grace A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 19% |
20 | DE JAGER Celine | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 43% | 10% |
21 | CORDERO Allison | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 36% | 10% | 1% |
22 | CHERNYSHOVA Victoria | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 47% | 13% |
23 | HUH Anna | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 37% | 7% |
24 | YAO Jillian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 31% | |
25 | BRANDWEIN Elizabeth | 100% | 93% | 62% | 23% | 4% | - | - |
26 | SIDDIQUI Ammna K. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 23% | 3% |
27 | YANG Chloe | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 51% | 19% | 3% |
28 | BYRON Karen J. | 100% | 97% | 82% | 50% | 19% | 4% | - |
29 | FAZZINI Angelina | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 25% | 5% | - |
30 | SINGH Aayushi | 100% | 73% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
31 | BOOK Ayelet | 100% | 95% | 71% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - |
32 | GERTISER Amalie (Amy) C. | 100% | 97% | 80% | 47% | 17% | 3% | - |
33 | HONG Elaine | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 48% | 12% | |
34 | GUZZI Jordan | 100% | 90% | 56% | 20% | 3% | - | |
35 | CHANG Ella | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 46% | 15% | 2% |
36 | BOWIE Charlotta | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 20% | 3% | |
37 | MCGEE Sophia | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 20% | 3% |
38 | XU Jessica | 100% | 88% | 54% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
39 | LI Allison | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 24% | 6% | 1% |
40 | RICHARDS Caitlin A. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 66% | 32% | 9% | 1% |
41 | GAO Judy | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 25% | 5% |
42 | AVERBACH Margaret | 100% | 76% | 30% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
43 | MOK Chloe R. | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 18% | 3% | - |
44 | ZENG Katrina | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 21% | 3% | |
45 | SCHMULTS Sophie W. | 100% | 97% | 74% | 35% | 8% | 1% | |
46 | ZEHE Michele A. | 100% | 96% | 75% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - |
47 | APPLEBEE Andralyn | 100% | 94% | 68% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - |
48 | RIOS Donna B. | 100% | 83% | 43% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
49 | GOLDBERG Sophie C. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 52% | 18% | 3% |
50 | HARJANI Meher | 100% | 79% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
51 | LI Alisha | 100% | 98% | 83% | 48% | 15% | 2% | - |
52 | GANGEMI Julia | 100% | 88% | 52% | 18% | 3% | - | |
53 | CANNEY Lauren | 100% | 95% | 73% | 37% | 10% | 1% | |
54 | HOSANAGAR Inchara | 100% | 78% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
55 | INAMDAR Nina S. | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 20% | 4% | - |
56 | WALSH Katherine | 100% | 77% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
57 | WILKINSON Heather E. | 100% | 86% | 47% | 13% | 2% | - | |
58 | DELGADO Diane | 100% | 75% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
59 | MURRELL Jessica L. | 100% | 76% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
60 | DANNHAUSER Carol A. | 100% | 85% | 51% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
60 | PAN Iris | 100% | 81% | 39% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.