Dominican University New York - Orangeburg, NY, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | TRAUGOT Owen G. | V V V V D V | V V V V V | 5.0 | 5 | - |
| 2 | LEE Brendan | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 3.3 | 6 | +2.7 |
| 3 | KITAGAWA Eric S. | V V V V V | V V V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
| 3 | TSIMIKLIS Yanni | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.4 | 6 | +0.6 |
| 5 | HAN Changhee | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.3 | 6 | +1.7 |
| 6 | SONG Noel | V V V V V | V V D | 3.4 | 5 | +1.6 |
| 7 | YOON DYLAN | V D V V V V | V V D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
| 8 | ZELTSER Lawrence M. | V V D D V | V V D | 4.5 | 3 | -1.5 |
| 9 | LIN James G. | V V V V V V | V D | 5.2 | 6 | +0.8 |
| 10 | FEDONCHIK Henry J. | D V V V V | V D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
| 11 | PITERBARG Maxim | V D V V V D | V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 12 | PYO Michael M. | V V V D V D | V D | 5.0 | 4 | -1.0 |
| 13 | AKYAMAC Bora | V D V D V | V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 14 | WANG Mason | D V D V D V | V V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 15 | TAN Aidan | V V D D D V | V V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 16 | LIU Ryan | D V V D D V | V V D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 17 | LIU Kovi | V D V V V V | D | 4.9 | 5 | +0.1 |
| 18 | SRINIVASAN Vedant | V V V D V V | D | 3.2 | 5 | +1.8 |
| 19 | KOVACS Wyatt | D V V V V | D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 20 | XU Ethan | V V D V D | D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 21 | WANG Brian | V V D D V | D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 22 | MAGALONG William | D D V V V | V D | 1.6 | 3 | +1.4 |
| 23 | TJON Calum | V D V D V D | V D | 1.6 | 3 | +1.4 |
| 24 | ZHANG Lucas | D V V V D D | D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
| 25 | VISHAWADIA Jaimin | V D D V D V | V D | 1.5 | 3 | +1.5 |
| 26 | SYOMICHEV Gleb A. | V V D D D | V D | 3.4 | 2 | -1.4 |
| 27 | POPE Alexander | V D V D D | V D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 28 | YU Stephen | V D D D D V | V D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 29 | LEE Eugene | D V D V D D | V D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
| 30 | LI Allen | V D D V D D | V D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 31 | TANG Terry | D D V D D | V D | 2.6 | 1 | -1.6 |
| 32 | JURMAN Therin | D V D D D | V D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
| 33 | WUN Jonathan | D D V V D | D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
| 34 | ZENG Rick | D D D V V | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 35 | GRANADOS Luis | V D D V D | D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
| 36 | CHO Xzander | D V D D V D | D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 37 | CHEN Ethan | D D V D V D | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 38 | KALIPERSAD Neil A. | D D D D V D | D | 3.3 | 1 | -2.3 |
| 39 | REZA Farazi | D D D D D V | D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
| 40 | PERLMAN Taiyo | D D D D V D | D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
| 41 | MARTIN Darius | D D D V D D | D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
| 42 | PLASTARAS Trey | D D D D D D | 3.4 | 0 | -3.4 | |
| 42 | FRANK Amir | D D D D D D | D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
| 44 | NADOL Sam | D D D D D | D | 0.4 | 0 | -0.4 |
| 45 | LORANGER Peter | D D D D D D | D | 2.0 | 0 | -2.0 |
| 46 | MONTERROSO Sebastian | D D D D D | D | 0.3 | 0 | -0.3 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.