Madison, NJ - Madison, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | KOO Haley B. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 71% |
| 2 | FERRARI Christina M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 67% |
| 3 | JING Emily | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% | 28% | |
| 3 | SHEN Sophia H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 70% | 23% | |
| 5 | LESLIE Ryanne T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 73% | 28% | |
| 6 | MOLHO Sofia | 100% | 100% | 98% | 79% | 28% | ||
| 7 | LEVI Lea | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 24% | |
| 8 | KOO Rachel A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 48% | |
| 9 | SHEN Jasmine N. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 22% | |
| 10 | LEE Bethany W. | 100% | 99% | 87% | 52% | 14% | 1% | |
| 11 | XU Madison | 100% | 99% | 83% | 43% | 10% | 1% | |
| 12 | SADAN Jordan E. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 66% | 20% | |
| 13 | YU Jaime L. | 100% | 93% | 60% | 16% | 1% | ||
| 14 | COSTELLO Angeline S. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 55% | 18% | 2% | |
| 15 | RASO Sofia G. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 43% | ||
| 16 | SERBAN Samantha M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 62% | 19% | |
| 17 | HOOSHI Erica S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 32% | |
| 18 | KOENIG Charlotte R. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 58% | 16% | |
| 19 | ZHENG Ivy | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 41% | |
| 20 | YE Eileen | 100% | 100% | 98% | 80% | 39% | 8% | |
| 21 | PEVZNER Victoria | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 43% | |
| 22 | CHEN Kelly | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 25% | 3% |
| 23 | HECKMANN Emma | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 22% | 2% |
| 24 | LOW Sharon J. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 61% | 24% | 3% |
| 25 | WU Irene M. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 17% | 1% |
| 26 | ADAMS KIM Natalie | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 33% | 7% | - |
| 27 | DU Hannah | 100% | 94% | 59% | 19% | 2% | - | |
| 28 | PO Edith | 100% | 100% | 86% | 43% | 10% | 1% | |
| 29 | MUELLER Tatum J. | 100% | 98% | 83% | 49% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 30 | MCKEE Alexandra K. | 100% | 72% | 24% | 3% | - | ||
| 31 | LI Meilin | 100% | 99% | 87% | 50% | 13% | 1% | |
| 32 | WERBACH Esther | 100% | 72% | 27% | 5% | - | - | |
| 33 | ZHAO Aileen Y. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 30% | 6% | - |
| 34 | FERRETTI Anna Rebecca | 100% | 100% | 98% | 78% | 35% | 6% | |
| 35 | WU Julianna Y. | 100% | 97% | 48% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 36 | RENTON Samantha | 100% | 100% | 95% | 66% | 16% | 1% | |
| 37 | PAVE Claire | 100% | 96% | 56% | 13% | 1% | - | |
| 38 | ACHILOVA Feyza | 100% | 99% | 87% | 44% | 10% | 1% | |
| 39 | SU Michelle | 100% | 93% | 63% | 22% | 3% | - | |
| 40 | HEISER Anna M. | 100% | 71% | 18% | 2% | - | - | |
| 41 | HUNT Abigail S. | 100% | 88% | 46% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 42 | BHAN Zala | 100% | 90% | 53% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 43 | LOGAN Jade | 100% | 71% | 24% | 3% | - | ||
| 44 | ZHANG Alina C. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 21% | 3% | |
| 44 | TANG Ai Jia | 100% | 98% | 69% | 22% | 2% | - | |
| 46 | NICOU Melina | 100% | 58% | 13% | 1% | - | - | |
| 47 | MCPHERSON Hannah C. | 100% | 84% | 43% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 48 | BASSON Bayley D. | 100% | 96% | 75% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 49 | GINDE Maithili | 100% | 63% | 21% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 50 | JONES Jenna | 100% | 34% | 5% | - | - | - | |
| 51 | THIRUVENGADAM Harini | 100% | 11% | - | - | - | - | |
| 52 | DAUM Sydney | 100% | 73% | 30% | 5% | - | - | |
| 53 | SIEB Sydney | 100% | 17% | 1% | - | - | - | |
| 53 | ABREU Ashley | 100% | 75% | 26% | 4% | - | - | |
| 55 | DOWNER Emma-Li | 100% | 77% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.