Ontario Convention Center - Hall A & B - Ontario, CA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | HEPLER Sarah | V V V D D V | V V V V V | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
| 2 | LEWIS Rachel | D V V V V V | V V V V D | 2.9 | 5 | +2.1 |
| 3 | HARRISON Amelia H. | V V D D V D | V V V D | 5.3 | 3 | -2.3 |
| 3 | WANG Angelina | V V D V V V | V V V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
| 5 | BARON Sabina | V V V V V | V V D | 3.5 | 5 | +1.5 |
| 6 | OLORVIDA Isabella | D V V V V D | V V D | 2.0 | 4 | +2.0 |
| 7 | CHUNG Kimberly L. | V V D V D | V V D | 4.2 | 3 | -1.2 |
| 8 | MUNOZ Andrea H. | D D V V D V | V V D | 4.7 | 3 | -1.7 |
| 9 | LENDIS Gabrielle | V V V V V | V D | 2.6 | 5 | +2.4 |
| 10 | DAVIS Julia | V D V V V V | V D | 3.2 | 5 | +1.8 |
| 11 | LORES Alicia | D V V V V | V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 12 | HAU Olivia | V D D V V V | V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
| 13 | CAREY Michele S. | V V V D D | V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
| 14 | DUONG Zoey | D V V D V D | V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 15 | DAYAL Saahira | D V V D D | V V D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
| 16 | LAI Amanda | D D D D D D | V V D | 2.2 | 0 | -2.2 |
| 17 | WANG Zoe | V V V V V D | D | 2.8 | 5 | +2.2 |
| 18 | KUKVA Taisiya | V V D V V | D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 19 | BROWN Riley | V V D D V V | D | 2.5 | 4 | +1.5 |
| 20 | TAN Jocelyn | V D V D V | D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 21 | CHANG Celine A. | V D D V V | D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 22 | MOHEBI Sue | V V D D V | D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 23 | MA Katelyn | V V V D D D | D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 24 | DENG Annie | V D V D V D | D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
| 25 | GULLY Wren | V V V D D D | D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 26 | MADRID Maureen | V D D V D V | D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
| 27 | HASIM Eurietta | D D V D V | D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
| 28 | POON Desiree | D V D D V | V D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
| 29 | CHIEM Karen | V D D V D | V D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 30 | RYAN Minhuey | D D V D V D | V D | 4.4 | 2 | -2.4 |
| 31 | BEAMS Alyona | D D V D D V | V D | 3.6 | 2 | -1.6 |
| 32 | PERKINS-OLLILA Emily | D D D V D | V D | 0.7 | 1 | +0.3 |
| 33 | PRIMES Amanda M. | D D V V D | D | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 |
| 34 | FRANEK Lisa | D D D V D V | D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 35 | CHUNG Penelope | D D V D D | D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
| 36 | BARNEY Lindsey | D D D D D | D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
| 37 | CHEN Samantha | D D D D D D | D | 0.4 | 0 | -0.4 |
| 38 | OSTRIKOFF Michelle | D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
| 39 | LARENTIS Octavia Isolde | D D D D D D | D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.