Madison, NJ - Madison, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | TALAAT Mohamed | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 47% | 15% | 2% |
| 2 | MICHELL Bailey | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 52% | |
| 3 | MILGRAM Nathan A. | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 27% | 6% | 1% |
| 3 | WU Mengke | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 18% | 2% |
| 5 | BRAR Sanjeet | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 54% | 22% | 4% |
| 6 | KURTZFREILICH Jake A. | 100% | 99% | 94% | 77% | 47% | 18% | 3% |
| 7 | MOSKOWITZ Mason C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 61% | 22% |
| 8 | YEN Preston | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 83% | 51% | 16% |
| 9 | KIM-COGAN Ryan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 42% | 9% |
| 10 | TANG Albert | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 35% | 5% | |
| 11 | CHAMBERS Amir E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 44% |
| 12 | BERMAN Luca | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 51% | 11% |
| 13 | LASORSA Matthew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 19% |
| 14 | MARGULIES William | 100% | 98% | 82% | 48% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 15 | YUAN Kevin | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 38% | 10% | 1% |
| 16 | FISK Ethan | 100% | 95% | 69% | 30% | 6% | - | |
| 17 | GILES Jeremy M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 31% |
| 18 | BUKOWSKI Bronson | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 44% | |
| 19 | TSUNG David | 100% | 99% | 95% | 80% | 50% | 20% | 4% |
| 20 | HO Kaden M. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 48% | 16% | 2% |
| 21 | GOEBEL Alex J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 61% | 16% |
| 22 | TRAVAGLIONE Conor D. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 42% |
| 23 | WOLIN Zachary | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 42% | 9% | |
| 24 | CHON Taylor A. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 68% | 34% | 8% |
| 25 | ZHOU Miles | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 20% | 3% |
| 26 | XU William | 100% | 100% | 94% | 74% | 39% | 11% | 1% |
| 27 | LEE Jude H. | 100% | 97% | 77% | 38% | 9% | 1% | |
| 28 | HOEY-WASOW Henry | 100% | 97% | 81% | 50% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 29 | SPOSATO Andrew P. | 100% | 97% | 74% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 30 | HUANG Ethan F. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 28% | 5% |
| 31 | DENG Andrew | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 50% | 17% | 2% |
| 32 | HONG Vincent Q. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 36% | 9% | 1% |
| 33 | CLYMER Lucas Y. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 40% | 12% | 1% |
| 34 | ANGKATAVANICH Owen | 100% | 92% | 66% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 35 | CLAWSON Amzie | 100% | 95% | 74% | 41% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 36 | CHENG Kyle | 100% | 99% | 87% | 57% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 37 | TOPF Karl B. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 20% | 3% |
| 38 | DIPIETRO Christopher J. | 100% | 97% | 79% | 45% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 39 | TISHININ Alexander D. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 25% | 4% | - |
| 40 | PANDEY Neil | 100% | 91% | 62% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 41 | SANDERS Samuel B. | 100% | 99% | 86% | 53% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 42 | ZATZ Ben Z. | 100% | 64% | 22% | 4% | - | - | |
| 43 | SANFILIPPO-SCHERER Alexander G. | 100% | 97% | 78% | 42% | 11% | 1% | |
| 44 | MALATESTA Michael | 100% | 91% | 61% | 24% | 5% | - | |
| 45 | NOBLE Colin | 100% | 98% | 88% | 63% | 31% | 9% | 1% |
| 46 | SHAO Peter | 100% | 85% | 48% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 47 | RODE Leon J. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 64% | 30% | 6% |
| 48 | KREGER Evan | 100% | 93% | 65% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 49 | DREITLEIN Eric | 100% | 81% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 50 | HUANG Tyler T. | 100% | 97% | 78% | 41% | 11% | 1% | |
| 51 | SIRAGUSA Chris | 100% | 95% | 71% | 31% | 6% | - | |
| 52 | SWITALA Dylan F. | 100% | 90% | 61% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 53 | EPSTEIN Oliver D. | 100% | 89% | 56% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 54 | HU Andrew | 100% | 99% | 89% | 64% | 30% | 8% | 1% |
| 55 | GRYCIUK Koby | 100% | 73% | 26% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 56 | BLEYMAN David | 100% | 87% | 56% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 57 | TEVEBAUGH Andrew | 100% | 99% | 90% | 66% | 33% | 10% | 1% |
| 58 | LAMHAOUAR Ryan | 100% | 84% | 45% | 12% | 1% | - | |
| 59 | MOULTON Ian | 100% | 53% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 60 | BUCCINO George | 100% | 59% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 60 | XIAO Ethan | 100% | 27% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.