Thousand Oaks, CA - Thousand Oaks, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | CHIN Jason Y. | - | - | - | 5% | 23% | 44% | 27% |
2 | OH Jonathan | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 5% |
3 | CHOI Samuel | - | 4% | 18% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 2% |
3 | KIM Aaron J. | - | 3% | 13% | 31% | 35% | 16% | 2% |
5 | CHIN Julian S. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 41% | 31% |
6 | SWEENEY Quinn | 10% | 31% | 35% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
7 | HSIUNG Richie | 1% | 12% | 31% | 34% | 18% | 4% | - |
8 | GODZHIK Zachary | - | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 42% | 26% |
9 | TSAY Jeremy M. | - | 1% | 8% | 22% | 35% | 26% | 8% |
10 | XIAO EDWARD | - | 3% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 2% |
11 | SELIVANOV Adam | 8% | 30% | 37% | 19% | 4% | < 1% | - |
12 | WU Conrad J. | 4% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - |
13 | KO Tyler B. | 1% | 6% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 10% | 1% |
14 | LEE David Y. | 3% | 19% | 37% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - |
15 | VAZQUEZ Zander | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 5% |
16 | MCCOSH Evin M. | 5% | 21% | 36% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - |
17 | JAIN Aditya | - | - | 1% | 5% | 25% | 46% | 23% |
18 | STIAGUN Nikita | 1% | 10% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 6% | - |
19 | LO Conrad | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 40% | 44% |
20 | AIBEL Hudson J. | - | 5% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
21 | HOBSON Aaron K. | 2% | 18% | 36% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - |
22 | HOU Kenneth | 5% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
23 | NG Eben S. | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 40% | 23% | 4% |
24 | GOLDADE Luke A. | 21% | 40% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
24 | WONG Luke S. | 6% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
26 | MU Jeffrey | 18% | 38% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
27 | NAM Michael | 64% | 30% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.