Thousand Oaks, CA - Thousand Oaks, CA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | WONG Anthony M. | D V V V V | V V V V V | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 2 | DIVITO Dylan | V V D V V | V V V V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 3 | PROUTY Nicholas C. | D V V V V | V V V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
| 3 | DARIANO Noah G. | D D V V D | V V V V D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
| 5 | BHARATHI Bhrugu S. | V V V V V V | V V D | 5.2 | 6 | +0.8 |
| 6 | NGUYEN Jett | V V D V V | V V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 7 | JEON Caleb A. | D V V D V V | V V D | 4.6 | 4 | -0.6 |
| 8 | XIAO EDWARD | V V D D V | V V D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 9 | FORTNER Lance R. | V V V V V | V D | 3.4 | 5 | +1.6 |
| 10 | CATLIN Adam | D V V V V V | V D | 4.6 | 5 | +0.4 |
| 11 | KELLY William J. | V V V D V | V D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
| 12 | FUKUDA Renzo K. | V V D D V V | V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
| 13 | BARTEL Jacob L. | D D V D V | V V D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 14 | KIM Brandon J. | V D D V D | V V D | 3.6 | 2 | -1.6 |
| 15 | AVRON Case B. | D D D V D | V V D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
| 16 | LI Raphael C. | D D V D D | V V D | 3.3 | 1 | -2.3 |
| 17 | GIRALDO Pablo E. | V V V V V V | D | 4.5 | 6 | +1.5 |
| 18 | WONG NICHOLAS A. | V V V V V | D | 2.9 | 5 | +2.1 |
| 19 | FUKUDA Alessio R. | V V V V V | D | 3.0 | 5 | +2.0 |
| 20 | CHIN Jason Y. | V V V D V V | D | 5.1 | 5 | -0.1 |
| 21 | SCHENCK Theo | V D V V V | D | 2.5 | 4 | +1.5 |
| 22 | HSIUNG Richie | V V D V V | D | 2.1 | 4 | +1.9 |
| 23 | NGUYEN Nish | V D V V D | D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 24 | TSAY Jeremy M. | V V D D V | D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 25 | WOMACH Tristan | V D D V D V | D | 1.4 | 3 | +1.6 |
| 26 | WONG Luke S. | V D D V V D | V D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
| 27 | MCCOSH Evin M. | D D V D V | V D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
| 28 | CHOI Samuel | V D V D D | V D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 29 | WHARTON Zachary | D V D V D | V D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 30 | CHIN Julian S. | D V D V D | V D | 3.3 | 2 | -1.3 |
| 31 | KO Tyler B. | D V V D D | V D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 32 | SWEENEY Quinn | D D V V D D | V D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 33 | WU Conrad J. | V D V D D | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 34 | JORDON Kaleb W. | V D D D V | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 35 | LEE David Y. | V D V D D D | D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 36 | GOLDADE Luke A. | D V D D D | D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
| 37 | KIM BANSEOK | D V D D D D | D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 |
| 38 | LI Ryan Z. | D D D V D D | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 39 | KIM Aaron J. | D D D D D | D | 2.2 | 0 | -2.2 |
| 40 | MU Jeffrey | D D D D D | D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
| 41 | HOU Kenneth | D D D D D | D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
| 42 | MA Jonas(zhao long) | D D D D D | D | 0.4 | 0 | -0.4 |
| 43 | NAM Michael | D D D D D D | D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.