Thousand Oaks, CA - Thousand Oaks, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | WONG Anthony M. | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 42% | 33% | |
2 | DIVITO Dylan | - | 1% | 6% | 27% | 46% | 20% | |
3 | PROUTY Nicholas C. | - | - | 2% | 15% | 44% | 39% | |
3 | DARIANO Noah G. | - | 5% | 21% | 38% | 28% | 7% | |
5 | BHARATHI Bhrugu S. | - | - | - | 2% | 16% | 44% | 37% |
6 | NGUYEN Jett | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 41% | 20% | |
7 | JEON Caleb A. | - | - | 1% | 10% | 35% | 40% | 14% |
8 | XIAO EDWARD | 2% | 15% | 33% | 33% | 15% | 2% | |
9 | FORTNER Lance R. | - | 2% | 15% | 36% | 35% | 11% | |
10 | CATLIN Adam | - | - | 1% | 10% | 34% | 41% | 14% |
11 | KELLY William J. | - | - | 1% | 11% | 39% | 49% | |
12 | FUKUDA Renzo K. | - | - | 3% | 17% | 40% | 32% | 7% |
13 | BARTEL Jacob L. | 3% | 25% | 41% | 25% | 6% | 1% | |
14 | KIM Brandon J. | - | 1% | 11% | 31% | 39% | 17% | |
15 | AVRON Case B. | 20% | 39% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - | |
16 | LI Raphael C. | - | 3% | 15% | 37% | 36% | 9% | |
17 | GIRALDO Pablo E. | - | - | 1% | 12% | 38% | 38% | 11% |
18 | WONG NICHOLAS A. | 1% | 7% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 5% | |
19 | FUKUDA Alessio R. | 1% | 7% | 24% | 37% | 26% | 6% | |
20 | CHIN Jason Y. | - | - | - | 3% | 19% | 45% | 34% |
21 | SCHENCK Theo | 2% | 13% | 34% | 36% | 15% | 2% | |
22 | HSIUNG Richie | 4% | 23% | 40% | 26% | 7% | - | |
23 | NGUYEN Nish | 2% | 14% | 36% | 36% | 12% | 1% | |
24 | TSAY Jeremy M. | - | 3% | 18% | 37% | 32% | 10% | |
25 | WOMACH Tristan | 14% | 41% | 33% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
26 | WONG Luke S. | 1% | 14% | 40% | 34% | 10% | 1% | - |
27 | MCCOSH Evin M. | 22% | 45% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - | |
28 | CHOI Samuel | 3% | 25% | 40% | 24% | 6% | 1% | |
29 | WHARTON Zachary | 5% | 28% | 40% | 22% | 5% | - | |
30 | CHIN Julian S. | - | 3% | 16% | 37% | 34% | 11% | |
31 | KO Tyler B. | 7% | 30% | 40% | 20% | 3% | - | |
32 | SWEENEY Quinn | 2% | 15% | 39% | 33% | 10% | 1% | - |
33 | WU Conrad J. | 7% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 6% | 1% | |
34 | JORDON Kaleb W. | 5% | 27% | 39% | 23% | 5% | - | |
35 | LEE David Y. | 1% | 10% | 35% | 39% | 13% | 2% | - |
36 | GOLDADE Luke A. | 34% | 44% | 18% | 3% | - | - | |
37 | KIM BANSEOK | 2% | 15% | 37% | 34% | 11% | 1% | - |
38 | LI Ryan Z. | 11% | 47% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
39 | KIM Aaron J. | 4% | 20% | 36% | 28% | 10% | 1% | |
40 | MU Jeffrey | 46% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - | - | |
41 | HOU Kenneth | 42% | 42% | 14% | 2% | - | - | |
42 | MA Jonas(zhao long) | 63% | 31% | 5% | - | - | - | |
43 | NAM Michael | 41% | 43% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.