Phoenix Fencing Academy - Tempe, AZ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
1 | MCBRYAN Teresa | 1% | 9% | 36% | 41% | 13% | |
2 | PYE Emily | 23% | 48% | 26% | 2% | < 1% | |
3 | SAUCEDO Grecia | 2% | 29% | 49% | 18% | 2% | |
3 | NICHOLS Amber | - | - | 3% | 26% | 47% | 23% |
5 | BAKER Tina | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 34% | 11% |
6 | STANT Hannah | 1% | 13% | 40% | 37% | 9% | |
7 | PERKINS-OLLILA Emily | 17% | 41% | 32% | 10% | 1% | |
8 | KUNIHIRO Ashley | 1% | 14% | 37% | 36% | 12% | |
9 | ULRICH Zoe | 4% | 23% | 41% | 26% | 6% | - |
10 | GROTTS Loy | 17% | 41% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - |
11 | TAARIQ Tanisha | - | 2% | 15% | 43% | 40% | |
12 | CEPIN Ash | 1% | 7% | 32% | 43% | 17% | |
13 | FAIR Elizabeth | 2% | 10% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 5% |
14 | BARVICK Kathleen | 8% | 42% | 37% | 12% | 1% | - |
15 | MARIKOS Christina | 6% | 27% | 39% | 23% | 5% | |
16 | BILLINGS M. Saylor | 63% | 31% | 5% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.