New Jersey City University - John Moore Athletic Center - Jersey City, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | AKYAMAC Bora | - | - | - | 1% | 6% | 32% | 62% |
2 | ZHAO Adam | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 41% | 43% |
3 | BRAIZINHA Thomas | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 39% | 21% | |
3 | SRINIVASAN Vedant | - | 1% | 6% | 27% | 46% | 20% | |
5 | GULCHIN Mark (Yerma) | - | - | 1% | 9% | 37% | 53% | |
6 | BAKSHI Aman | 2% | 13% | 33% | 35% | 15% | 2% | |
7 | CHEN Ethan | - | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 41% | 31% |
8 | HARRA Alexander | - | 4% | 22% | 41% | 28% | 5% | |
9 | RIPA Joseph K. | - | 5% | 19% | 36% | 30% | 9% | 1% |
10 | ONIK Ari N. | 1% | 5% | 19% | 33% | 29% | 11% | 1% |
11 | JIMENEZ Naveen | - | 1% | 4% | 17% | 35% | 34% | 9% |
12 | SIMONOV Timofey | - | 1% | 7% | 30% | 44% | 19% | |
13 | ZENG Rick | - | - | 4% | 18% | 42% | 37% | |
14 | BAI Brian | 1% | 11% | 29% | 36% | 19% | 3% | |
15 | XU Nathan | 6% | 22% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 1% | |
16 | MARTIN Mason | 3% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 2% | |
17 | TANG Terry | - | - | - | 3% | 16% | 41% | 40% |
18 | MO Ethan | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 34% | 12% | |
19 | JURMAN Therin | 1% | 9% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 5% | |
20 | TOOMRE Kai | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 38% | 17% | |
21 | LEE Charles T | - | 5% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 10% | 1% |
22 | BAI Austin | 3% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 12% | 2% | |
23 | DIAZ Gabriel | 22% | 41% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - | |
24 | JAZWINSKI Ryan | - | 7% | 26% | 38% | 24% | 5% | |
25 | WOODCOCK Henry | 6% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 9% | 1% | |
26 | BHAN Amar | 9% | 34% | 39% | 16% | 2% | - | |
27 | REN Ryan | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 4% |
28 | CHEN kenneth | 12% | 33% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
29 | KRZYWON Dylan | 11% | 32% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
30 | KO Caleb | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 39% | 29% | 4% |
31 | POLEPALI Vinil | 3% | 19% | 37% | 29% | 10% | 1% | - |
32 | PERLMAN Taiyo | 2% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 16% | 3% | - |
33 | CHO Xzander | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 40% | 23% | |
34 | WONG Jacob W. | - | 5% | 23% | 41% | 26% | 4% | |
35 | GECKELER James | - | 4% | 15% | 31% | 32% | 15% | 3% |
36 | TANG Royce | - | 5% | 20% | 36% | 30% | 9% | |
37 | CHENG Austyn | 2% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 3% | |
38 | CHUNG Ian | 6% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
39 | DHANOA Kian | 4% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - |
40 | WIDOFF-WOODSON Jackson Leroi | 7% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
41 | XIE Jicheng | 3% | 19% | 39% | 29% | 8% | 1% | |
42 | BOURGUIGNAT James | 20% | 42% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - | |
43 | QIAN Zekai | 2% | 24% | 42% | 26% | 6% | - | |
44 | HELMY Richard | 2% | 24% | 42% | 26% | 6% | - | |
45 | KOVACS Harrison | 4% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 10% | 1% | |
46 | SION Andrew | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
47 | POLEBOYINA Amrit | 3% | 14% | 30% | 32% | 17% | 4% | - |
48 | SHIN Noah | 11% | 33% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
49 | MIRCHANDANI Aditya | 3% | 15% | 31% | 31% | 16% | 4% | - |
50 | SUNDSTROM Wren | 12% | 33% | 33% | 17% | 4% | 1% | - |
51 | PECK Quinn | 1% | 12% | 32% | 35% | 17% | 3% | |
52 | HOLLIS Sean | 11% | 31% | 34% | 18% | 5% | - | |
53 | XU Brian | 65% | 30% | 5% | - | - | - | |
54 | ZHAO Ryan | 3% | 25% | 40% | 25% | 7% | 1% | |
55 | MCCARTHY Hudson | 3% | 22% | 39% | 27% | 8% | 1% | |
56 | KUO Phineas | - | 5% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 10% | 1% |
57 | BRAIZINHA David | 23% | 41% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
58 | LIEN Alexander | 1% | 14% | 33% | 32% | 15% | 4% | - |
59 | STARKIE Kitteridge | 3% | 20% | 40% | 29% | 7% | - | |
60 | FRIEDMAN Marcus | 35% | 42% | 19% | 4% | - | - | |
61 | RAO Arnav | 4% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 11% | 1% | |
62 | DA SILVA Jamie | 8% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - |
63 | CHANG Ian | 75% | 23% | 2% | - | - | - | |
64 | STEVENS Dylan | 1% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 4% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.