Salt Lake City, UT - Salt Lake City, UT, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | MARTINEZ Donavyn E. | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 42% | 42% |
2 | MORAIS Paulo | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 40% | 43% |
3 | KELLY William J. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 41% | 24% |
3 | DESERANNO Jeidus | - | - | - | 2% | 12% | 41% | 44% |
5 | YU Vinni | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 44% | 36% |
6 | HOOSHI Dylan M. | - | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 39% | 18% |
7 | FUKUDA Alessio R. | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 39% | 20% | 3% |
8 | BAE Junnie | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 4% |
9 | LIN Richard W. | - | - | 1% | 10% | 30% | 40% | 19% |
9 | MION Lorenzo | - | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 34% | 14% |
11 | CHEN Andrew | - | - | 5% | 19% | 36% | 30% | 10% |
12 | MA Alexander | - | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 44% | 16% |
13 | BURKE Spencer W. | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 34% | 31% | 11% |
14 | GRANT Lachlan K. | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 8% |
15 | LAURICELLA Douglas | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 4% |
16 | PAEK Alex J. | - | - | 4% | 20% | 37% | 30% | 8% |
17 | LI Raphael C. | - | 2% | 15% | 34% | 33% | 13% | 2% |
18 | KIM Yonjae | - | - | 2% | 12% | 33% | 38% | 15% |
19 | BANERJEE ANUP | - | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 32% | 11% |
20 | KIM Tei D. | - | - | 3% | 16% | 36% | 34% | 11% |
21 | ZHANG Andy W. | - | - | 2% | 14% | 38% | 36% | 10% |
22 | JEON Caleb A. | - | - | 6% | 25% | 38% | 25% | 6% |
23 | SONG Aiden S. | - | 3% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 17% | 3% |
24 | CHENG Matthew S. | 1% | 11% | 31% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - |
25 | YU Anders | 1% | 6% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 8% | 1% |
26 | KASI Sanjay | - | - | 2% | 13% | 36% | 38% | 11% |
27 | GIRALDO Pablo E. | - | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 35% | 14% |
27 | SCHEMBRI MCCORD Kruz T. | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 36% | 30% | 10% |
29 | LIN Dashiell | - | 1% | 10% | 30% | 37% | 20% | 4% |
29 | SONG Leonardo T. | - | 2% | 15% | 35% | 33% | 13% | 2% |
31 | KUMBLA Samarth | - | - | 2% | 16% | 39% | 34% | 9% |
32 | HOOSHI Jayden C. | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 5% |
33 | HAN Andersen Y. | - | 5% | 21% | 39% | 27% | 8% | 1% |
34 | LO Conrad | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 7% |
35 | CHIN Jason Y. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 42% | 23% |
36 | BING Charles | - | 5% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
37 | NEWELL Ian A. | - | 12% | 34% | 36% | 15% | 3% | - |
38 | CHIN Julian S. | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 3% |
39 | BARTEL Jacob L. | 4% | 22% | 38% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - |
40 | WEN George C. | - | 2% | 12% | 33% | 35% | 16% | 3% |
41 | OH Samuel H. | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 8% |
42 | DING Jonathan | - | 2% | 9% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 5% |
43 | NAGER Noah | 1% | 7% | 22% | 33% | 26% | 10% | 1% |
44 | OH Jonathan | - | 1% | 10% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 3% |
45 | CHEN Wilson | 3% | 26% | 40% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
46 | SUNG Chang-Han S. | 12% | 33% | 34% | 17% | 4% | 1% | - |
47 | KIM Isaiah G. | - | 2% | 14% | 34% | 34% | 14% | 2% |
48 | OTAKE Jared K. | - | - | 4% | 20% | 38% | 30% | 8% |
49 | CHEN Allen | - | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 32% | 9% |
50 | DIERKS Kian | 1% | 12% | 34% | 34% | 16% | 3% | - |
51 | GATZA Logan | 7% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
52 | LEE Joshua | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 3% |
53 | GODZHIK Zachary | - | 3% | 24% | 39% | 26% | 7% | 1% |
54 | SONG Dylan S. | 4% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - |
55 | ZHAO Jason L. | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 5% |
56 | ZHAO Jesse | 13% | 38% | 35% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
57 | CAI Jason Zhicheng | - | 3% | 30% | 43% | 20% | 4% | - |
58 | MILLER Duncan R. | - | 3% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 8% | 1% |
59 | HSIUNG Richie | 10% | 33% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
60 | SYLVESTER William Z. | 11% | 43% | 34% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
61 | ZACHARY Zane | 22% | 57% | 19% | 2% | - | - | - |
62 | CHIRASHNYA Adam | 7% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
63 | KEE Andrew L. | 2% | 13% | 29% | 32% | 18% | 5% | 1% |
64 | PHAM-CHANG Duke A. | 12% | 34% | 34% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
65 | LUH Ethan K. | 3% | 20% | 39% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - |
66 | XIAO EDWARD | - | 7% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 6% | - |
67 | KIM Jackson | 17% | 37% | 31% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
68 | SEAL Maximus R. | 29% | 42% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
69 | LIM Charles Q. | 23% | 43% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
70 | MCCOSH Evin M. | 32% | 46% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
71 | FINNEY Lorenz | 28% | 47% | 21% | 4% | - | - | - |
72 | WOLLER Camren | 53% | 38% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
73 | WANG Gerald Y. | 35% | 43% | 19% | 4% | - | - | - |
74 | BOSELEY Owen | 70% | 28% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
75 | MILLER Chance | 33% | 44% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
76 | DORMAN Patrick | 60% | 36% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
77 | KIM Aaron J. | 3% | 16% | 34% | 30% | 13% | 3% | - |
78 | LI Ryan Z. | 19% | 44% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
79 | ZHENG zhe | 14% | 38% | 35% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
80 | KLEIN Sebastian W. | 10% | 34% | 36% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
80 | CHAMBERS Eli | 20% | 62% | 17% | 2% | - | - | - |
80 | WONG Louis | 73% | 24% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
80 | HOGAN Gideon | 52% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
84 | DURSTELER Ryken | 17% | 49% | 31% | 3% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.