Salt Lake City, UT - Salt Lake City, UT, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | KELLY William J. | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 10% |
| 2 | CHUNG Andrew N. | - | - | - | - | 2% | 20% | 78% |
| 3 | CHEN Andrew | - | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 35% | 13% |
| 3 | YU Vinni | - | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 42% | 29% |
| 5 | LIN Richard W. | - | - | 5% | 23% | 40% | 26% | 5% |
| 6 | MION Lorenzo | - | - | 3% | 16% | 38% | 34% | 9% |
| 7 | DESERANNO Jeidus | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 43% | 37% |
| 8 | HU Oliver W. | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 37% | 28% | 7% |
| 9 | MARTINEZ Donavyn E. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 42% | 27% |
| 10 | KASI Sanjay | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 8% |
| 11 | YANG Adam | - | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 35% | 15% |
| 12 | PAEK Alex J. | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 4% |
| 13 | OH Samuel H. | - | 3% | 15% | 31% | 32% | 16% | 3% |
| 14 | ZHANG Andy W. | - | - | 4% | 19% | 37% | 31% | 9% |
| 15 | GIRALDO Pablo E. | - | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 37% | 17% |
| 16 | NAGER Noah | 3% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 17 | MAURER Ned (John) E. | - | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 37% | 17% |
| 17 | WEN George C. | - | 3% | 17% | 36% | 30% | 11% | 2% |
| 19 | MA Alexander | - | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 42% | 28% |
| 20 | CHIN Jason Y. | - | 1% | 5% | 22% | 38% | 28% | 7% |
| 21 | MORAIS Paulo | - | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 41% | 26% |
| 22 | KUMBLA Samarth | - | - | 4% | 17% | 36% | 33% | 11% |
| 23 | BING Charles | - | 4% | 17% | 33% | 31% | 13% | 2% |
| 24 | CHEN Allen | 1% | 8% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 7% | |
| 25 | FARQUHARSON Cole | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 16% | 3% |
| 26 | ZHAO Jason L. | - | 1% | 4% | 17% | 34% | 32% | 11% |
| 27 | CHENG Matthew S. | 2% | 17% | 36% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 28 | BAE Junnie | 1% | 8% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 7% | |
| 29 | HONDA Kazu Z. | - | 3% | 15% | 31% | 32% | 16% | 3% |
| 30 | KELLY Benjamin J. | - | 3% | 19% | 39% | 29% | 9% | 1% |
| 30 | SWEENEY Quinn | 24% | 48% | 23% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 32 | LAURICELLA Douglas | - | 1% | 14% | 38% | 36% | 11% | - |
| 33 | GRANT Lachlan K. | - | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 32% | 11% |
| 34 | LEE Joshua | - | 5% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 1% |
| 35 | BANERJEE ANUP | - | - | 2% | 15% | 40% | 39% | 5% |
| 36 | LIN Dashiell | - | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 36% | 15% |
| 37 | VITI Mark G. | - | 2% | 9% | 24% | 35% | 24% | 6% |
| 38 | LI Raphael C. | - | 1% | 18% | 41% | 32% | 8% | - |
| 39 | XIAO EDWARD | 1% | 6% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 10% | 1% |
| 40 | FUKUDA Alessio R. | - | 4% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
| 41 | LUH Ethan K. | 19% | 38% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 42 | HOOSHI Dylan M. | - | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 33% | 11% |
| 43 | KIM Isaiah G. | - | 4% | 18% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 2% |
| 44 | HSIUNG Richie | 4% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 45 | KIM Tei D. | - | 3% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 16% | 3% |
| 46 | URODOVSKIKH Evan | - | 5% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 10% | |
| 47 | ZHENG Alan H. | - | 2% | 14% | 33% | 34% | 15% | 2% |
| 48 | CHIN Julian S. | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 3% |
| 49 | DIERKS Kian | 1% | 19% | 39% | 30% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 50 | SUNG Chang-Han S. | 17% | 40% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 51 | KIM Yonjae | - | 2% | 13% | 31% | 33% | 17% | 3% |
| 52 | GU Jeffrey | - | 3% | 29% | 42% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 53 | PHAM-CHANG Duke A. | 28% | 41% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 54 | FUKUDA Renzo K. | 2% | 12% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 4% | |
| 55 | BARTEL Jacob L. | 1% | 13% | 36% | 34% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 56 | SONG Leonardo T. | 1% | 6% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 10% | 1% |
| 57 | JEON Caleb A. | - | 1% | 9% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 6% |
| 58 | DING Jonathan | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 4% |
| 59 | WU Albert | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 4% |
| 60 | MCCOSH Evin M. | 32% | 48% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 61 | YU Anders | 1% | 10% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
| 62 | WANG Gerald Y. | 33% | 47% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 63 | LI Ryan Z. | 22% | 41% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 64 | MILLER Duncan R. | 5% | 28% | 38% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 65 | SPEVAK Alexander | - | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 34% | 12% |
| 66 | BURKE Spencer W. | - | 2% | 12% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 3% |
| 67 | KIM Jackson | 14% | 43% | 31% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 68 | ARNOLD Oscar A. | - | 6% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 1% |
| 69 | LIM Charles Q. | 47% | 40% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 70 | HAN Andersen Y. | 1% | 8% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
| 71 | AMICO Julian F. | - | 10% | 31% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 72 | SONG Dylan S. | 1% | 13% | 35% | 34% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 73 | CHIRASHNYA Adam | 15% | 36% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 74 | GODZHIK Zachary | 5% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 9% | 1% | |
| 75 | HOOSHI Jayden C. | - | 5% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 1% |
| 76 | NEWELL Ian A. | 7% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 77 | SONG Aiden S. | - | 2% | 15% | 34% | 33% | 13% | 2% |
| 78 | KEE Andrew L. | 2% | 15% | 39% | 32% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 79 | SYLVESTER William Z. | 19% | 41% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 80 | KIM Aaron J. | 6% | 24% | 36% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 81 | CAI Jason Zhicheng | 13% | 34% | 33% | 15% | 4% | - | - |
| 82 | BOSELEY Owen | 60% | 37% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
| 83 | SHAJI Karthik | 3% | 34% | 41% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 84 | MURATA Akitoshi D. | 38% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 85 | MILLER Chance | 54% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 86 | DORMAN Patrick | 85% | 14% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
| 87 | PATINO Yahir | 31% | 43% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 88 | ZACHARY Zane | 28% | 60% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 89 | JEFFERY Jakob | 58% | 34% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 90 | DURSTELER Ryken | 82% | 17% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.