Salt Lake City, UT - Salt Lake City, UT, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | JING Alexandra | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 37% |
| 2 | CASTANEDA Erika L. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 24% | |
| 3 | SOOD Ishani S. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 60% | 24% | 4% | |
| 3 | HOOSHI Erica S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 19% |
| 5 | CHO Gracie L. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 30% | 5% | |
| 6 | SHEN Sophia H. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 53% | 16% | |
| 7 | LIAO Lu Jia (Lucy) | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 43% | 10% | |
| 8 | SEAL Grace (Gracie) C. | 100% | 97% | 81% | 49% | 18% | 3% | |
| 9 | DAVIA Daniella V. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 57% | 16% | |
| 10 | TAKAMIZAWA Yukari | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 76% | 41% | 10% |
| 11 | GUERRA Sofia E. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 32% | 6% |
| 12 | FERNANDES Thea | 100% | 96% | 74% | 38% | 11% | 1% | |
| 13 | CHO Taylor S. | 100% | 97% | 76% | 36% | 8% | 1% | |
| 14 | GALAVOTTI Claire Teresa | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 35% | 7% | |
| 15 | CHEN Kelly | 100% | 95% | 76% | 42% | 14% | 2% | |
| 16 | KIM Katherine | 100% | 95% | 72% | 36% | 9% | 1% | |
| 17 | LUNG Katerina | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 19% | |
| 18 | LEE Bethany W. | 100% | 96% | 79% | 46% | 16% | 2% | |
| 19 | CHEN Allison V. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 34% | 9% | 1% |
| 20 | KHOO Lauren A. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 38% | 8% | |
| 21 | KIM Elisabeth (Gracie) | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 30% | 6% | |
| 22 | UPTON Elizabeth | 100% | 98% | 85% | 50% | 16% | 2% | |
| 23 | WANG Catherine K. | 100% | 71% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 24 | PRIETO Sofia M. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 60% | 25% | 6% | - |
| 25 | LOCKE Savannah | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 36% | 10% | 1% |
| 26 | PENTSAKOV Margaret | 100% | 92% | 64% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 27 | LEE Paulina | 100% | 100% | 95% | 79% | 46% | 13% | |
| 28 | JING Emily | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 30% | |
| 29 | MILLER Naomi E. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 60% | 24% | 4% | |
| 30 | PENG Amber L. | 100% | 88% | 54% | 19% | 4% | - | |
| 31 | WU Irene M. | 100% | 94% | 70% | 35% | 10% | 1% | |
| 32 | ZHAO Sophie L. | 100% | 78% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 33 | KOROL Dana | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 30% | 7% | 1% |
| 34 | DUAN Konnie | 100% | 97% | 80% | 47% | 17% | 3% | |
| 35 | YHIP Mikaela M. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 28% | 5% | |
| 36 | FAN Elaine | 100% | 99% | 87% | 55% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 37 | HOLLAND Naomi | 100% | 53% | 14% | 2% | - | - | |
| 38 | HO Rachel E. | 100% | 91% | 53% | 16% | 2% | - | |
| 39 | SHEN Lydia | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 35% | 10% | 1% |
| 40 | WHITESIDES Ella K. | 100% | 69% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 41 | CHO Cameron S. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 42% | 12% | 1% |
| 42 | VOHRA Anusha | 100% | 91% | 55% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 43 | HEISER Anna M. | 100% | 49% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
| 44 | ZAMELIS Madelyn | 100% | 18% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.