Crossroads College Preparatory School - St. Louis, MO, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | SENIC Lucas | - | - | - | - | 2% | 22% | 75% |
2 | ZHOU Justin | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 41% | 27% | 2% |
3 | PALMA Nathan Anthony | - | - | - | - | 6% | 31% | 63% |
3 | MANDZY Theodor | - | - | - | 2% | 12% | 39% | 47% |
5 | LATORRE Leonardo | - | 3% | 17% | 37% | 32% | 10% | |
6 | FERGUSON Levi | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 34% | 15% | 1% |
7 | MCMILLIAN Harrison | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 40% | 21% | |
8 | HASTINGS Alex | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 34% | 13% | 1% |
9 | WENGER Liam | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 34% | 14% | 1% |
10 | LINEBERRY CADEN | 9% | 39% | 36% | 13% | 2% | - | |
11 | WENGER Rowan | - | 3% | 14% | 31% | 34% | 15% | 2% |
12 | MURPHY Jonathan | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 37% | 29% | 6% |
13 | MCCONKEY Tristan | 5% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - |
14 | BALES Gabriel | 7% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
15 | YOUNG Jack | 1% | 9% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 4% | - |
16 | SYMMANK Callen | 2% | 17% | 36% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - |
17 | CRONK Trevor | 3% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - |
18 | ELTOFT Caden | 1% | 7% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 4% | |
19 | JAKUBOVSKI Eric | 1% | 8% | 25% | 35% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
20 | LIM-SEIWERT Tristan | 8% | 28% | 36% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
21 | XU Rambert | 1% | 7% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 5% | |
22 | HALLETTMANES Ezra | 48% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - | - | - |
23 | MAZAHERI Theodore | 5% | 26% | 39% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
24 | MAZAHERI John | 7% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - |
25 | MUNOZ Rocco | 22% | 39% | 28% | 9% | 2% | - | - |
26 | MARTIN Wesley | 8% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - |
27 | GARRARD Jeremiah | 50% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.