Junior Olympic National Championships

Junior Women's Épée

Saturday, February 16, 2019 at 1:00 PM

Denver, CO - Denver, CO, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 YEFREMENKO Dariya (Dasha) (Dasha) 100% 100% 100% 98% 88% 60% 22%
2 JOYCE Michaela 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 93% 61%
3 MANGANO Ariana J. 100% 100% 100% 100% 98% 86% 49%
3 TANIBAJEVA Rachel L. 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 95% 66%
5 PARK Faith K. 100% 100% 100% 100% 98% 85% 45%
6 TAYLOR Audrey Y. 100% 100% 99% 92% 70% 32% 6%
7 BEDDINGFIELD Claire E. 100% 100% 100% 99% 95% 74% 32%
8 TYLER Syd 100% 100% 99% 95% 80% 48% 15%
9 RATZLAFF Jocelyn T. 100% 100% 100% 99% 95% 74% 31%
10 KOMAR Sofia 100% 100% 100% 100% 96% 72% 26%
11 SHEFFIELD Lake Mawu 100% 100% 99% 91% 69% 36% 9%
12 GRADY Miriam A. 100% 100% 100% 100% 98% 83% 42%
13 YEU Irene 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 93% 58%
14 BEITTEL Chloe F. 100% 100% 100% 96% 81% 47% 13%
15 DANIEL Chloe L. 100% 100% 100% 97% 80% 41% 8%
16 NIXON Caroline (Karolina) L. 100% 100% 100% 100% 98% 88% 51%
17 LIN Jessica Y. 100% 100% 100% 100% 98% 86% 49%
18 RAUSCH Ariana (Ari) M. 100% 100% 100% 100% 97% 80% 38%
19 CHOI Lyla 100% 100% 100% 97% 83% 45% 11%
20 SUMRALL Emily M. 100% 98% 83% 50% 18% 3% < 1%
21 BUCUR Rebekah O. 100% 100% 99% 94% 71% 29%
22 HUSISIAN Hadley N. 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 95% 67%
23 LIANG Jessica 100% 100% 100% 99% 94% 73% 31%
24 YAMANAKA Mina 100% 100% 100% 98% 87% 57% 18%
25 WATRALL Christina 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 92% 56%
26 ZAFFT Tatiana M. 100% 100% 99% 92% 68% 29% 4%
27 GILL Kaitlyn Y. 100% 100% 100% 97% 83% 50% 14%
28 ADAMS KIM Madeline 100% 100% 99% 95% 76% 41% 10%
29 MALDONADO Pilar I. 100% 100% 99% 90% 67% 32% 7%
30 BINDAS Blodwen S. 100% 99% 91% 64% 29% 7% 1%
31 COBERT Helen G. 100% 97% 81% 45% 13% 2%
32 LEE Yejine 100% 100% 97% 81% 45% 10%
33 GAO Emily L. 100% 100% 100% 99% 92% 63% 14%
34 BRILL Sophie 100% 100% 96% 81% 50% 18% 3%
35 BOYS Nishta B. 100% 100% 100% 98% 88% 60% 20%
36 KHROL Jaclyn 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 88% 49%
37 ZUHARS Renee A. 100% 100% 100% 97% 85% 55% 18%
38 CHAN Cheri K. 100% 100% 96% 77% 40% 10% 1%
39 LIM Clarice 100% 100% 99% 92% 69% 33% 7%
40 WHITTEMORE Lucy K. 100% 100% 96% 80% 47% 15% 1%
41 KIMURA Kimberley H. 100% 100% 96% 81% 48% 16% 2%
42 PATURU Meghana 100% 99% 89% 61% 26% 5%
42 BULAVKO Sonia 100% 100% 96% 78% 42% 10%
44 LIN Anna F. 100% 88% 52% 18% 3% -
45 KWON Athina 100% 100% 99% 90% 58% 19% 2%
46 GABERKORN Nadia 100% 100% 99% 94% 69% 30% 6%
47 REID Sobia 100% 99% 94% 76% 43% 14% 2%
47 BROOKS Tean R. 100% 100% 98% 87% 58% 22% 3%
49 CHU Audrey 100% 100% 98% 86% 53% 17% 2%
50 LEE Hanna Y. 100% 100% 99% 94% 70% 29% 4%
51 WANG Karen 100% 100% 100% 98% 86% 51% 12%
52 SNIDER Margot (Maggie) 100% 100% 100% 99% 90% 62% 20%
53 ROBLES Elena 100% 100% 99% 94% 75% 39% 9%
54 PYO Yunice 100% 100% 98% 83% 49% 14% 1%
55 SCALA Emma 100% 100% 96% 80% 45% 11%
56 GAO Aretha R. 100% 100% 100% 97% 82% 49% 14%
57 NGUYEN Kaylin A. 100% 100% 99% 92% 69% 33% 7%
58 SHAMSIAN Shaya 100% 100% 95% 78% 46% 16% 2%
58 LEE Sumin 100% 100% 99% 93% 72% 36% 8%
60 BELSLEY Devon K. 100% 97% 82% 51% 20% 4% -
61 KUZNETSOV Victoria 100% 100% 98% 90% 65% 31% 7%
62 FILIPPOV Nika D. 100% 99% 90% 61% 27% 6% 1%
63 TONCHEVA Victoria M. 100% 100% 99% 90% 60% 22% 3%
64 SCHMUGAR Brooke 100% 94% 68% 32% 8% 1% -
65 MACHULSKY Leehi 100% 100% 100% 100% 98% 86% 44%
66 KHAMIS Yasmine A. 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 91% 57%
67 LEUNG Natalie 100% 100% 98% 89% 64% 29% 6%
68 LEE Michelle 100% 100% 99% 92% 70% 33% 7%
69 KOWALSKY Rachel A. 100% 100% 99% 91% 62% 23% 3%
70 LURYE Sarah 100% 100% 100% 99% 94% 73% 30%
70 YOON Julia J. 100% 100% 100% 96% 78% 40% 6%
72 ENO Megan E. 100% 100% 100% 99% 91% 63% 18%
73 KETKAR Ketki 100% 100% 100% 96% 80% 45% 11%
73 GEBALA Natalie Brooke A. 100% 100% 100% 97% 82% 45% 10%
75 BALAKRISHNAN Monica S. 100% 100% 98% 88% 62% 28% 6%
76 KETKAR Mallika 100% 100% 99% 90% 64% 29% 6%
77 KIM Elizabeth Y. 100% 93% 67% 30% 8% 1% -
78 YEE-WADSWORTH Sofia L. 100% 98% 82% 47% 15% 2%
79 GREGORY Elizabeth 100% 100% 97% 82% 49% 14%
80 PROCTOR Sara J. 100% 100% 100% 98% 88% 59% 20%
81 MARTUS Cosima O. 100% 100% 100% 95% 76% 37% 5%
82 O'REILLY Aeryn E. 100% 100% 98% 89% 62% 24% 3%
82 WEISS Talia L. 100% 100% 97% 84% 53% 19% 3%
84 CHAN Paree A. 100% 100% 97% 82% 50% 18% 3%
85 ROBERTSON Lily 100% 96% 75% 39% 12% 2% -
85 ZHANG Maya 100% 99% 91% 67% 30% 6% -
87 KHROL Caralina 100% 100% 100% 97% 84% 52% 15%
88 LANZMAN Anna B. 100% 97% 77% 43% 15% 3% -
89 DROVETSKY Alexandra M. 100% 100% 98% 89% 65% 30% 6%
89 BEI Karen 100% 100% 95% 72% 35% 9% 1%
91 NI Emma 100% 100% 98% 86% 55% 20% 3%
92 MOHABIR Ariane 100% 100% 95% 76% 44% 15% 2%
92 LEANG Priscilla Y. 100% 99% 93% 71% 36% 9% 1%
94 WU Amelia 100% 100% 100% 97% 83% 49% 14%
95 JHANGIANI Geeta L. 100% 100% 100% 99% 92% 67% 25%
96 LIVERANT Jordan S. 100% 100% 99% 90% 65% 30% 6%
97 DOLGONOS Melanie 100% 100% 98% 88% 60% 23% 2%
98 DE JAGER Celine 100% 86% 51% 18% 3% - -
99 O'DONNELL Amanda A. 100% 99% 94% 74% 39% 10%
100 LABBE Kathryn M. 100% 99% 90% 64% 28% 5%
101 PHILLIPS Summer E. 100% 100% 99% 91% 63% 22%
102 NORCONK Claire R. 100% 79% 39% 10% 1% -
103 LIN Katie Y. 100% 100% 100% 94% 71% 31% 5%
104 CHIN Isabella 100% 100% 97% 84% 53% 18% 2%
105 ROSS Naomi O. 100% 100% 100% 98% 86% 55% 17%
105 MCLANE Lauren 100% 100% 97% 83% 53% 20% 3%
107 KIM Natalie S. 100% 98% 85% 54% 21% 4% -
107 MINASSIAN Arianna M. 100% 94% 69% 32% 8% 1% -
109 SLACKMAN Valerie 100% 100% 95% 76% 40% 11% 1%
110 GANDHI Sedna S. 100% 100% 100% 98% 85% 42% 8%
111 KIM Erika S. 100% 98% 80% 44% 14% 2% -
112 MOSKOFF Tessa 100% 99% 93% 70% 34% 9% 1%
113 ROTHMAN-HALL Bronwyn R. 100% 98% 86% 58% 25% 6% -
114 SIDDIQUI Ammna K. 100% 94% 68% 29% 6% 1% -
115 VERA Kalista R. 100% 100% 99% 92% 70% 34% 8%
115 QURESHI Aafreen 100% 99% 90% 65% 32% 9% 1%
115 SAAL Anna 100% 99% 93% 69% 30% 5% -
118 LIU Jennifer L. 100% 99% 94% 74% 41% 13% 2%
119 LEANG Andrea K. 100% 100% 95% 76% 40% 11% 1%
120 DOUGLAS Julia F. 100% 100% 93% 66% 28% 6% -
121 TSANG JAFFE Avi 100% 96% 74% 39% 12% 2% -
122 CHAN Elizabeth 100% 100% 97% 82% 48% 14% 1%
123 JIANG Claire 100% 92% 64% 27% 6% 1% -
124 BOTNER Olivia 100% 95% 72% 38% 12% 2% -
125 LIN Julia L. 100% 99% 87% 51% 16% 2% -
126 ZHOU Emily 100% 96% 69% 31% 8% 1% -
127 OPERARIO Abigail Z. 100% 96% 76% 42% 13% 2% -
129 KANG Dahyun 100% 100% 99% 91% 65% 26% 3%
130 LAVERY Chloe K. 100% 99% 90% 64% 29% 7% 1%
131 HILL Gabrielle (Gabby) M. 100% 100% 98% 90% 67% 32% 7%
132 LEE Olive 100% 95% 68% 26% 5% - -
133 JI Catherine 100% 100% 96% 76% 35% 7% -
134 KULKARNI Diya 100% 100% 99% 95% 77% 42% 9%
135 MOGLIANESI Brianna L. 100% 100% 99% 93% 71% 33% 6%
136 MCCARTHY Sara I. 100% 89% 58% 24% 6% 1% -
137 MORGAN Lexiss M. 100% 100% 98% 86% 57% 23% 4%
138 BUVARP Elisabeth M. 100% 100% 100% 96% 81% 48% 13%
139 KIM Diane E. 100% 99% 93% 70% 33% 6%
140 HUH Anna 100% 90% 61% 25% 6% 1% -
141 WOLF Isabella A. 100% 99% 91% 67% 32% 8% 1%
142 BARNES Olivia R. 100% 99% 91% 67% 34% 9% 1%
143 KOZAK Maeve E. 100% 90% 60% 26% 7% 1% -
144 AHUJA Arianna 100% 94% 68% 33% 10% 2% -
145 IGOE Nirali B. 100% 99% 93% 67% 28% 5% -
146 TAO Olivia A. 100% 100% 98% 89% 62% 25% 3%
147 SCHAFF Marlene M. 100% 90% 57% 22% 4% - -
148 SHOATES Jacqueline A. 100% 100% 100% 99% 94% 70% 25%
150 CAO Catherine H. 100% 99% 90% 63% 28% 6% 1%
151 WANG Elizabeth 100% 100% 99% 94% 75% 39% 9%
152 PALMER Amelia C. 100% 99% 88% 59% 23% 4% -
152 EBRAHIM Ameera H. 100% 97% 74% 36% 10% 1% -
154 MCNEILL Claire A. 100% 100% 98% 87% 60% 26% 5%
154 ZHAO Yingying 100% 97% 79% 45% 15% 3% -
156 YAO Jillian 100% 93% 68% 32% 8% 1% -
156 SOIN Anika A. 100% 85% 48% 15% 2% - -
158 JOBALIA Ria 100% 100% 98% 85% 51% 15% 1%
158 PANDEY Sana 100% 96% 72% 34% 9% 1% -
160 WANG Ariana 100% 98% 88% 63% 31% 9% 1%
161 YOUNG Ashley 100% 98% 86% 55% 20% 3% -
161 CAPELLUA Mariasole 100% 98% 82% 46% 15% 2% -
163 DIDONATO Gianina L. 100% 99% 89% 60% 24% 5% -
164 DING Sandra 100% 90% 53% 15% 2% - -
165 NICOU Nicole 100% 59% 16% 2% - - -
165 GAO Judy 100% 97% 79% 44% 14% 2% -
167 HODGES Grace A. 100% 97% 82% 48% 17% 3% -
168 BACH Caroline 100% 70% 28% 6% 1% - -
169 MOTON Mckenzie R. 100% 85% 47% 15% 2% -
170 HAN Jaewon(Leah) 100% 98% 84% 52% 19% 3%
171 PATEL Aditi S. 100% 72% 30% 7% 1% -
172 REITINGER Emilie B. 100% 98% 83% 49% 16% 2%
173 JANOWSKI Madeline (Madeline Janowski) A. 100% 96% 74% 38% 11% 2% -
174 MYERS Helen Sophia A. 100% 97% 81% 48% 15% 2% -
175 DESAMOURS Sabine I. 100% 100% 99% 90% 64% 26% 3%
175 SON Katherine (Injee) 100% 88% 55% 21% 4% - -
177 WU Clara 100% 84% 48% 17% 3% - -
178 PARK Yoohyun 100% 100% 100% 98% 87% 56% 17%
179 SMUK Daria A. 100% 94% 67% 30% 7% 1% -
180 THOW Jessica P. 100% 95% 71% 34% 9% 1% -
180 MCGEE Sophia 100% 97% 76% 40% 12% 2% -
182 MILLER Veronica 100% 96% 74% 36% 10% 1% -
183 SHEPARD Jazzy M. 100% 99% 93% 71% 35% 10% 1%
184 MARONEY Gianna 100% 94% 66% 27% 6% 1% -
185 RUSSELL Renata 100% 87% 54% 21% 5% 1% -
185 GILBRETH Meghan G. 100% 99% 86% 48% 14% 2% -
185 HENRY Asha S. 100% 100% 98% 87% 58% 21% 3%
188 FOLEY Lauren 100% 91% 55% 18% 3% - -
189 KAUR Simarpreet 100% 99% 90% 64% 29% 6% -
190 ROBERTS Gabrielle W. 100% 99% 91% 66% 32% 8% 1%
191 DILLARD Katlyn M. 100% 97% 82% 49% 17% 3% -
192 ADVINCULA Anabella E. 100% 89% 56% 20% 4% - -
193 BOLES Savvianna 100% 88% 54% 19% 4% - -
194 LI Tiffany 100% 61% 19% 3% - - -
195 PARK Ashley Y. 100% 94% 67% 26% 5% - -
196 LIU Christina A. 100% 100% 95% 77% 45% 15% 2%
197 JIN Jasmine 100% 97% 82% 49% 17% 3% -
198 KIM Caroline 100% 97% 81% 50% 19% 4% -
199 ERTAS Eileen 100% 95% 72% 35% 10% 1% -
200 ZHANG Chuyi 100% 92% 64% 28% 7% 1% -
201 LIANG Ashley 100% 86% 50% 17% 3% - -
201 BUCUR Naomi 100% 99% 89% 57% 20% 3% -
203 KUNDU Anisha 100% 99% 91% 65% 28% 5%
204 OH Kaitlin Y. 100% 76% 35% 9% 1% -
205 PERALTA-VIRTUE Kamilla M. 100% 99% 86% 53% 18% 3%
206 SEMIKIN Julia 100% 96% 76% 42% 14% 2%
207 HUANG audrey 100% 95% 74% 38% 12% 2% -
208 DAVIS Sophie R. 100% 96% 77% 43% 14% 2% -
208 MIZZI Keira 100% 98% 84% 45% 13% 2% -
210 FENG Kelly L. 100% 89% 57% 22% 5% - -
211 KORNGUTH Lindsay 100% 99% 90% 65% 30% 7% 1%
212 PEREZ Gabriella (Gabi) S. 100% 99% 90% 64% 28% 6% -
212 SAGE Kayla G. 100% 97% 79% 44% 14% 2% -
214 TONG Sarah Shen 100% 99% 88% 53% 14% 2% -
215 NELSON Gwendolyn H. 100% 83% 45% 14% 2% - -
216 CHIODI Isabella M. 100% 91% 61% 24% 5% - -
216 DUAN Jenny S. 100% 89% 56% 21% 4% - -
216 STRATTON Alexia 100% 59% 17% 2% - - -
219 DINGMAN Amanda 100% 99% 87% 56% 22% 4% -
219 WICKEN Baylee S. 100% 93% 66% 29% 7% 1% -
221 GOLDBERG Sophie C. 100% 82% 38% 9% 1% - -
222 BIGGS Amelia F. 100% 99% 89% 61% 25% 5% -
222 YACOBI Gabrielle R. 100% 81% 36% 8% 1% - -
224 WHEELER Luna 100% 88% 57% 24% 6% 1% -
225 SHAO Ariel 100% 89% 55% 18% 3% - -
226 KERAMANE Halah Z. 100% 78% 30% 6% 1% - -
226 COVITZ Ashley A. 100% 19% 1% - - - -
228 MYERS Jeanelle Christina A. 100% 71% 25% 4% - - -
229 FAILMEZGER Emmeline E. 100% 94% 69% 34% 10% 2% -
230 GOEL Pari 100% 100% 98% 88% 62% 27% 5%
231 ARAYE Nasro 100% 77% 37% 11% 2% - -
232 KRICK Olivia A. 100% 96% 75% 37% 9% 1% -
233 LAHIRI Nayeli 100% 73% 31% 7% 1% - -
234 ZINK Kayla 100% 89% 55% 20% 4% - -
235 BRYANT Michelle 100% 66% 22% 4% - - -
237 SHI Angela L. 100% 86% 52% 19% 4% - -
238 BACCHUS Leah 100% 82% 44% 14% 2% - -
239 BANKS Lauren M. 100% 69% 28% 6% 1% - -
240 WEBER Nora 100% 86% 47% 14% 2% -
241 SMIK Leonie A. 100% 100% 96% 78% 43% 12% 1%
242 KIM Sofia J. 100% 66% 24% 5% - - -
242 THORNTON Paula R. 100% 77% 32% 7% 1% - -
244 HIRSCH Naomi B. 100% 52% 14% 2% - - -
244 ENDERLE Alexis N. 100% 67% 27% 6% 1% - -
244 STANT hannah 100% 82% 26% 4% - - -
247 TOMASELLO Olivia E. 100% 81% 41% 12% 2% -
248 BANNING Grace 100% 70% 29% 6% 1% - -
248 BONDAR Nika 100% 67% 24% 4% - - -
250 FREIBURGER Ilyssa M. 100% 75% 35% 9% 1% - -
250 DONDISCH Sophia 100% 69% 29% 7% 1% - -
252 LONG Madeline M. 100% 48% 9% 1% - - -
252 BEARD Sarah Madeline 100% 66% 24% 4% - - -
254 WINESTOCK Sarah A. 100% 65% 15% 1% - - -
254 ADDERLEY Katherine M. 100% 69% 27% 6% 1% - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.