Liontree Arena (RIMAC) @ UC San Diego - La Jolla, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | BURKE Spencer W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 78% |
2 | SIU Aiden | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 62% |
3 | WOO Christian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 42% |
3 | CHIN Julian S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 39% | |
5 | CHENG Nathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 41% | |
6 | HOBSON Aaron K. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 57% | 17% | |
7 | MARTIN IV Elmer D. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% | 38% | |
8 | CANLAS Nathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 48% | |
9 | DETERING Julian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 50% | |
10 | LEUNG Chu Ming Aiden | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 46% | 10% | |
11 | LE Jacob W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 21% |
12 | LING Eddie | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 32% | 3% |
13 | OH Jaden | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 29% | 4% | |
14 | NICOLETTI Luca | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 67% | 18% | |
15 | PONS Diego | 100% | 99% | 90% | 54% | 16% | 2% | |
16 | KIM Aiden | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 37% | 8% | - |
17 | MUSHER Benjamin J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 60% | 19% |
18 | SCHIENEMAN Valentine | 100% | 65% | 22% | 4% | < 1% | - | |
19 | LLIDO Soren | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 27% | 4% | |
20 | MA Andrew | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 59% | 16% | |
21 | PARK Sky | 100% | 98% | 83% | 48% | 15% | 2% | |
22 | WU Alber Y. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 36% | 7% |
23 | DERRICK Blake | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 22% | 3% |
24 | HUANG Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% | 42% | 10% | 1% |
25 | ZHOU Hao Kai (Kevin) | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 33% | 6% | - |
26 | MORROW Brenden | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 34% | 4% |
27 | FUKUDA Diego | 100% | 100% | 99% | 85% | 47% | 10% | |
28 | DINSAY Kristjan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 52% | 12% |
29 | LI Avery Peihong | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 34% | 5% | |
30 | LE Jacob H. | 100% | 85% | 46% | 13% | 2% | - | |
31 | ZHANG Aaron | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 18% | 1% |
32 | YI William | 100% | 98% | 86% | 52% | 16% | 2% | |
33 | PARK Ryan | 100% | 97% | 77% | 37% | 9% | 1% | |
34 | PARK Rion | 100% | 100% | 99% | 81% | 41% | 10% | 1% |
35 | LI Matthew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 32% | 4% |
36 | CORTRIGHT Skipper | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 37% | 7% | |
37 | LAM Nicolas | 100% | 99% | 87% | 48% | 13% | 2% | - |
38 | CHAN Connor | 100% | 86% | 45% | 10% | 1% | - | |
38 | KIM Daniel Y. | 100% | 97% | 79% | 41% | 10% | 1% | |
40 | PINCHENG Yao | 100% | 89% | 55% | 19% | 3% | - | |
41 | AGRAWAL Niki | 100% | 84% | 47% | 14% | 2% | - | |
42 | REICHEL Ezra | 100% | 89% | 52% | 16% | 2% | - | |
43 | CHOI Ethan | 100% | 100% | 95% | 62% | 22% | 4% | - |
44 | ADAMS Cedric | 100% | 99% | 78% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - |
45 | BORG Matthew | 100% | 95% | 69% | 27% | 5% | - | - |
46 | WONG Evan | 100% | 99% | 76% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - |
47 | FINNEY Lorenz | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 36% | 7% | |
48 | ZHONG Maxwell | 100% | 60% | 14% | 1% | - | - | |
49 | ZHANG Jacob | 100% | 89% | 57% | 20% | 3% | - | |
50 | CAJERO Luis | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 47% | 13% | |
51 | TULYAG Azim | 100% | 87% | 47% | 11% | 1% | - | |
52 | MA Bryant | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 18% | 2% | |
53 | TSAY Jordan R. | 100% | 87% | 48% | 15% | 2% | - | |
54 | KALAMAS Nikolas | 100% | 76% | 25% | 3% | - | - | - |
55 | CHANG Nathan | 100% | 59% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
56 | KUO Jayden | 100% | 63% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
57 | ORNELAS Matteo | 100% | 59% | 17% | 2% | - | - | |
57 | KIM Jonah | 100% | 69% | 25% | 4% | - | - | |
59 | PARK David | 100% | 85% | 42% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
60 | YORK Lucas | 100% | 68% | 18% | 2% | - | - | |
61 | LIANG Ethan | 100% | 49% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
62 | TSOI Spencer | 100% | 67% | 22% | 3% | - | - | |
63 | DEJOURNETT Jacob | 100% | 11% | - | - | - | - | - |
64 | LI Gen | 100% | 53% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.