Indianapolis Fencing Club - Indianapolis, IN, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | EMMERT Jp | 100% | 99% | 87% | 56% | 20% | 3% | |
| 2 | DAZEY Jason T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 70% | 27% |
| 3 | SERAFYM Damian | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 37% | 7% | |
| 3 | MILLER Jackson | 100% | 80% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 5 | LAUER Michael | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 70% | 25% | |
| 6 | REED Dusty (Allen) | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 62% | 25% | 4% |
| 7 | BETTS Jr Anthony P. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 37% | 10% | 1% |
| 8 | TARR Robert | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 20% | |
| 9 | ELDRIDGE Darrell | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 77% | 43% | 11% |
| 10 | RIPLEY Ian | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 66% | 31% | 6% |
| 11 | PRIJATEL John R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 58% | 15% | |
| 12 | WINGET William (Bill) D. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 34% | 8% |
| 13 | SWANSON Dave | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 61% | 18% | |
| 14 | BAKKE Alexander | 100% | 99% | 90% | 66% | 32% | 9% | 1% |
| 15 | HE Lingyun Matthew | 100% | 82% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 16 | KELBLEY Newt J. | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 41% | 13% | 2% |
| 17 | CHRISTIAN John R. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 45% | 10% | |
| 18 | MANAUGH Calliope | 100% | 91% | 49% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 19 | BRENNEMAN Adam | 100% | 97% | 80% | 44% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 20 | MILLER Hayden | 100% | 77% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 21 | WANG Peter | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 30% | 7% | 1% |
| 22 | MILLER Brent | 100% | 92% | 62% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 23 | ORGAN Jason | 100% | 87% | 53% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 24 | ATWELL Madelyn | 100% | 66% | 19% | 2% | - | - | |
| 24 | BESEL Natalie | 100% | 76% | 27% | 1% | - | - | |
| 26 | HUBBARD Kelsi | 100% | 85% | 51% | 19% | 4% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.