East Bay Fencers Gym - Oakland, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | ||
1 | TEPEDELENLIOGLU Mehmet | - | - | - | - | 1% | 12% | 43% | 44% |
2 | RICHARD Silas | 1% | 7% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 5% | ||
3 | NICHOLSON Dimitri E. | - | - | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 38% | 19% |
3 | PERALTA Christian | 8% | 28% | 36% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - | |
5 | HERODOTOU Orestis | - | - | 1% | 4% | 18% | 36% | 31% | 9% |
6 | MENEGOLI Lorenzo | - | - | - | 1% | 6% | 34% | 59% | |
7 | SITTER Gregoire | 1% | 6% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 8% | 1% | |
8 | MAYCHROWITZ Matt | - | 2% | 10% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 7% | - |
9 | DUONG Zoey | 6% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 7% | 1% | ||
10 | PIVOVAROV Lucas | 4% | 36% | 39% | 17% | 4% | - | - | |
11 | SODHI Jaco | - | 5% | 19% | 33% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - |
12 | ROOD Alex | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 35% | 16% | 3% | |
13 | MADRID Maureen | 18% | 40% | 31% | 10% | 2% | - | - | |
14 | HEINS Dylan | 1% | 11% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 5% | - | - |
15 | HICKS Zachary | 1% | 7% | 22% | 33% | 25% | 10% | 2% | - |
16 | LONDON George | 1% | 7% | 21% | 31% | 25% | 11% | 3% | - |
17 | HELGE James R. | - | - | 2% | 10% | 29% | 40% | 21% | |
18 | NGUYEN Steven | - | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 8% |
19 | NICHOLSON Dominic A. | - | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 35% | 14% | |
20 | HARGROVE Charles | - | - | 2% | 11% | 34% | 43% | 10% | |
21 | SLATER Michael D. | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 43% | 25% | ||
22 | PHILIPPINE Johan L. | - | 5% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 11% | 2% | |
23 | SLOAN Ryan | 5% | 22% | 37% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - | |
24 | ABELE Chris | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 9% | |
25 | CHEN Steve | - | 1% | 7% | 20% | 32% | 27% | 11% | 2% |
26 | VERITY Charles | - | 4% | 17% | 31% | 30% | 14% | 2% | |
27 | KUO Michael | 14% | 35% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - | - | |
28 | LI Yunji | 8% | 34% | 38% | 17% | 3% | - | ||
29 | BEITTEL David F. | - | 4% | 15% | 30% | 30% | 16% | 4% | - |
30 | NGUYEN Grayson | 2% | 12% | 26% | 31% | 20% | 7% | 1% | - |
31 | HARGROVE Kai | 3% | 18% | 36% | 31% | 11% | 1% | ||
32 | DOWNEY Gerard C. | - | < 1% | 3% | 15% | 34% | 34% | 13% | |
33 | HOGE Patrick | 5% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 8% | 1% | ||
34 | OU wei | 9% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 5% | - | - | |
35 | BROCKMANN Brooke | 1% | 5% | 18% | 31% | 29% | 14% | 3% | |
36 | COHEN Jack | 1% | 13% | 42% | 33% | 10% | 1% | - | |
37 | AIRES Julia | 5% | 26% | 40% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
38 | MAYER Bob | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
39 | SHELBY Robert | 12% | 33% | 35% | 16% | 4% | - | - | |
40 | VERITY Alexander | 7% | 29% | 39% | 20% | 5% | - | - | |
41 | DUONG John | 43% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
42 | KAUR Jaap | 21% | 38% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - | - | - |
43 | LOGUE Paul | 6% | 26% | 38% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.