Raleigh Convention Center - Raleigh, NC, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | NATH Trisha | - | - | 1% | 12% | 42% | 45% | |
| 2 | JOHNSON Dagny L. | - | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 38% | 18% |
| 3 | CHRISTOTHOULOU Olympia C. | - | - | 2% | 12% | 29% | 37% | 19% |
| 3 | TSUI Natalie | - | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 33% | 11% |
| 5 | PAUL Lila | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 37% | 53% |
| 6 | ZHANG XUANYI | - | - | 3% | 16% | 42% | 39% | |
| 7 | DANTULURI Shalini | 2% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 8 | FEIG Sela | - | 1% | 7% | 28% | 46% | 19% | |
| 9 | YOUNG Charlotte G. | - | 3% | 13% | 29% | 33% | 18% | 4% |
| 10 | MCKEE Brynnley | - | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 41% | 32% |
| 11 | BEVACQUA Aria F. | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 35% | 54% |
| 12 | GUGALA Hanna | 1% | 13% | 37% | 35% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 13 | LUKASHENKO Angelina | - | - | 3% | 18% | 42% | 36% | |
| 14 | LEE Sophia | - | 2% | 11% | 32% | 39% | 16% | |
| 15 | SCOTT Eve | - | 4% | 19% | 37% | 31% | 8% | |
| 16 | JEONG Katie | - | 1% | 6% | 19% | 34% | 30% | 10% |
| 17 | GUVEN Coco | - | 2% | 11% | 27% | 34% | 20% | 5% |
| 18 | WEI JoyAnn | - | 4% | 21% | 40% | 28% | 6% | |
| 19 | ENDO Miyuki N. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 40% | 23% |
| 20 | CHIARELLI Valentina | - | - | 10% | 37% | 41% | 11% | |
| 21 | LIGH Erenei J. | - | - | 2% | 14% | 43% | 40% | |
| 22 | BERNARD Kathryn | 5% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 6% | 1% | |
| 23 | NATHANSON Sammy E. | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 42% | 24% | |
| 24 | WEI Vivian W. | - | 2% | 10% | 29% | 39% | 20% | |
| 24 | LIU Yifei | - | 1% | 10% | 29% | 40% | 19% | |
| 26 | BOYNTON Ainsley | 3% | 17% | 36% | 32% | 12% | 1% | |
| 27 | SO Catelyn | - | - | 4% | 16% | 34% | 34% | 12% |
| 28 | DAI Olivia | - | 4% | 16% | 32% | 32% | 14% | 2% |
| 29 | GRAJALES Hannah E. | - | - | 5% | 21% | 40% | 29% | 5% |
| 30 | CARTER Keely | 13% | 35% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - | |
| 31 | MARGULIAN Maria | 3% | 25% | 41% | 25% | 6% | - | |
| 32 | XU Emily T. | 2% | 16% | 34% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 33 | FERNANDEZ Martina | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 4% |
| 34 | ALFARACHE Gabriella C. | - | 2% | 10% | 30% | 40% | 18% | |
| 35 | MAKLIN Sofia | - | 2% | 13% | 31% | 37% | 16% | |
| 36 | MARYASH Samantha | - | - | 2% | 12% | 40% | 46% | |
| 37 | ZENG Sarah | - | 4% | 21% | 39% | 30% | 7% | |
| 38 | CHIN Elise | 1% | 6% | 22% | 37% | 28% | 7% | |
| 39 | HU Michelle | - | 4% | 18% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 2% |
| 40 | SCHAIBLE Sofia L. | 1% | 8% | 24% | 33% | 24% | 9% | 1% |
| 41 | BAWA Anahat | 1% | 10% | 28% | 34% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 42 | TENG EMMA | 2% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 43 | KRIVOSHEEV Alexandra | - | 5% | 22% | 40% | 28% | 5% | |
| 44 | CHAVAN Arya | 2% | 13% | 33% | 34% | 16% | 2% | |
| 45 | KANDADAI Lara | 1% | 11% | 34% | 36% | 16% | 2% | |
| 46 | TODD Phoebe | 3% | 16% | 35% | 32% | 13% | 2% | |
| 47 | PADANILAM Lily | 2% | 20% | 41% | 30% | 7% | 1% | |
| 48 | HUAI Delilah | - | - | 2% | 11% | 32% | 40% | 16% |
| 49 | KURAEVA Vasilisa | - | 4% | 16% | 33% | 31% | 13% | 2% |
| 50 | PRIEUR Lauren | - | - | - | 5% | 24% | 43% | 27% |
| 51 | TAN Kylie | 8% | 28% | 35% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 52 | MERCHANT Aishwarya | 7% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 53 | KHAN Alissa | - | - | 5% | 22% | 40% | 28% | 5% |
| 54 | ZHANG Sophie | - | 3% | 13% | 28% | 33% | 19% | 4% |
| 55 | LOO Kaitlyn | 1% | 6% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
| 56 | YEN Natalie | 6% | 26% | 37% | 24% | 7% | 1% | |
| 57 | HUANG MADELINE | 1% | 6% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 8% | |
| 58 | MONTORIO Lily M. | - | 7% | 42% | 39% | 12% | 1% | |
| 59 | MANN Sophia J. | - | 4% | 16% | 32% | 32% | 14% | 2% |
| 60 | WANG yining | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 5% |
| 61 | MEDVINSKY Alexandra | 1% | 10% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 3% | |
| 62 | FANG Sophie | - | 7% | 28% | 39% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 63 | DILLE Carolina G. | - | 3% | 13% | 29% | 33% | 19% | 4% |
| 64 | DUDNICK Morgan | 14% | 36% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - | |
| 65 | HAMBAZAZA Liisa | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 37% | 16% | |
| 66 | SCHOEW Margot | 3% | 18% | 39% | 30% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 67 | WUNNAVA Elina | 23% | 40% | 27% | 9% | 2% | - | - |
| 68 | LATYSHAVA Stephanie | 3% | 29% | 42% | 22% | 4% | - | |
| 69 | KONDEV Elizabeth | - | 1% | 16% | 43% | 33% | 7% | |
| 70 | KINKADE Ellie | 5% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 6% | 1% | |
| 71 | HU Anna | 6% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 7% | 1% | |
| 72 | LIN Nicole | - | 3% | 13% | 30% | 33% | 18% | 3% |
| 73 | STONE Coral | - | 3% | 17% | 37% | 31% | 11% | 1% |
| 74 | ZHAO Emily W. | 1% | 8% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
| 75 | CHEN Kevy | 1% | 7% | 22% | 33% | 26% | 10% | 2% |
| 76 | TREACY Aisling | 5% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 7% | 1% | |
| 77 | DHAR Layla | 4% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 2% | |
| 78 | BUSH Bethany | 10% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 5% | - | |
| 78 | FENG Alicia G. | 1% | 13% | 36% | 37% | 12% | 1% | |
| 80 | PAL Anjali G. | 4% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 9% | 1% | |
| 81 | MANKOVA Varvara | - | 10% | 31% | 38% | 18% | 3% | |
| 82 | SHINCHUK Ellisha | 1% | 6% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
| 83 | TA-ZHOU Emma | 13% | 34% | 34% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
| 84 | YOUNG Audrey | 1% | 8% | 24% | 33% | 24% | 9% | 1% |
| 84 | ONG Lauren | 23% | 46% | 25% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 86 | HUANG Neila | 18% | 38% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 87 | TUNG Renee | 1% | 6% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
| 88 | ELLIS-FURLONG Ava | 62% | 32% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
| 89 | CHI Claire | 20% | 41% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 89 | DANTULURI Shivani | 25% | 60% | 14% | 1% | - | - | |
| 91 | XIE Nora | 3% | 20% | 40% | 28% | 8% | 1% | |
| 92 | BARROSO Isabela | 8% | 35% | 38% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 93 | ZHOU Ziling | 49% | 39% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
| 94 | NEUMAN Ella | 5% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 95 | SHMULER Fiona | 37% | 41% | 18% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 96 | LITTLE Avery | 2% | 13% | 29% | 32% | 18% | 5% | 1% |
| 97 | DUCKETT Retta | 17% | 38% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 98 | SUHALIM Maree | 22% | 39% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 99 | DE SILVA Augusta | 12% | 33% | 35% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
| 100 | LAGOON Miriam | 5% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 101 | WANG Jiayi | 17% | 39% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - | |
| 102 | WUNNAVA Ellora | 42% | 40% | 15% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 102 | NAYAK Antara | 32% | 45% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 104 | GERASIMOVA Valeria | 75% | 23% | 2% | - | - | - | |
| 105 | KHOST Maeve | 8% | 40% | 37% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 106 | ELNATAN Mica A. | 33% | 42% | 20% | 4% | - | - | |
| 106 | HAMMERSTROM Aria | 9% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 5% | 1% | |
| 108 | MAROSFOI Virag | 71% | 26% | 3% | - | - | - | |
| 109 | MORGAN Lily | 63% | 35% | 3% | - | - | - | |
| 109 | DUCKETT Leighton | 36% | 42% | 18% | 4% | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.