Indianapolis Fencing Club - Indianapolis, IN, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | THOMAS Samuel | - | - | - | 4% | 32% | 64% | |
| 2 | WINGET William (Bill) D. | - | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 36% | 15% |
| 3 | CARDENAS Nathan A. | - | - | 3% | 18% | 39% | 31% | 8% |
| 3 | GOSMEYER Matthew E. | - | 4% | 20% | 39% | 31% | 6% | |
| 5 | RIPLEY Ian | - | - | 3% | 19% | 38% | 31% | 9% |
| 6 | MILLER Jackson | 3% | 20% | 39% | 30% | 8% | - | |
| 7 | BAKER Elizabeth | 2% | 16% | 34% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 8 | SPURGEON William | 1% | 19% | 41% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 9 | STOCK Olivia | 3% | 17% | 37% | 33% | 10% | - | |
| 10 | MACNEIL Matthew | - | 7% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
| 11 | ORGAN Jason | 7% | 30% | 38% | 20% | 4% | - | |
| 12 | PLUMMER Ken | 37% | 43% | 17% | 3% | - | - | |
| 13 | DAWES Isabel | 70% | 27% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.