Indianapolis Fencing Club - Indianapolis, IN, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | THOMAS Samuel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 64% | |
2 | WINGET William (Bill) D. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 15% |
3 | CARDENAS Nathan A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 40% | 8% |
3 | GOSMEYER Matthew E. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 37% | 6% | |
5 | RIPLEY Ian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 39% | 9% |
6 | MILLER Jackson | 100% | 97% | 77% | 38% | 9% | - | |
7 | BAKER Elizabeth | 100% | 98% | 81% | 48% | 16% | 3% | - |
8 | SPURGEON William | 100% | 99% | 80% | 38% | 8% | 1% | - |
9 | STOCK Olivia | 100% | 97% | 80% | 44% | 10% | - | |
10 | MACNEIL Matthew | 100% | 100% | 93% | 69% | 33% | 9% | 1% |
11 | ORGAN Jason | 100% | 93% | 63% | 25% | 4% | - | |
12 | PLUMMER Ken | 100% | 63% | 21% | 3% | - | - | |
13 | DAWES Isabel | 100% | 30% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.