Carmel Valley - San Diego, CA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | POLAKOSKI David R. | D V V V D | V V V V V | 4.0 | 3 | -1.0 |
| 2 | ZHOU Stanley Q. | V V V D V | V V V V D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
| 3 | BAILEY Creston P. | V V V D D V | V V V D | 4.6 | 4 | -0.6 |
| 3 | GAINES Aaron | V V V V V | V V V D | 4.6 | 5 | +0.4 |
| 5 | ROBITZSKI Daniel A. | V V V V V | V V D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
| 6 | SODERBERG Alex Z. | V V V V D | V V D | 4.5 | 4 | -0.5 |
| 7 | PARK Augustine | V V D D V V | V V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 8 | KURITZ Marc M. | V D V D V | V V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 9 | LEE Chun Po | V V V V V V | V D | 3.3 | 6 | +2.7 |
| 10 | SMITH Justin C. | V V V V V | V D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
| 11 | JOHNSTON Conner S. | V V V V V | V D | 3.5 | 5 | +1.5 |
| 12 | HIGGINS Branford | D V V V V V | V D | 4.9 | 5 | +0.1 |
| 13 | SINGHA Orion | D V V V V V | V D | 5.1 | 5 | -0.1 |
| 14 | WESTON Tom | V V V D V D | V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 15 | CHAO Warren | D D D V V V | V D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
| 16 | HILLSTROM Nathan | D V D V D | V D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 17 | LIU Yikun | V V V D V | D | 1.8 | 4 | +2.2 |
| 18 | HEWITT Frank F. | V V V V D D | D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 19 | POUKKULA Adrian | V D V V D | D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
| 20 | NELSON-LOVE Lily B. | D V D V V | D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 21 | ZAROTSKY Ronald | D V D V V D | D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 22 | SETTE Alessandro | D D D V V | D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 23 | MCDONALD Ethan | D D V D V | D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 24 | MIAO Kunqi | V V D D D | D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
| 25 | UVAROV Andrii | D D D V V | D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
| 26 | ALEXANDER Chuck | V D V D D | D | 3.6 | 2 | -1.6 |
| 27 | ALLEN David | D D D V D | V D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
| 28 | DILLON Anik | D D D D V | V D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
| 29 | DAVIDOVICH Eli | V D D D D | V D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
| 30 | LUPIEN Jonah | D D D V D D | V D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
| 31 | LIANG Dong | D D D D D | V D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
| 32 | VILELLA Joseph | D D D D D D | V D | 2.1 | 0 | -2.1 |
| 33 | CHAN Allison M. | V D D D D V | D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 34 | EGENOLF Gabriella | D V D D D | D | 0.5 | 1 | +0.5 |
| 35 | BANTZ Caleb | D D V D D D | D | 2.6 | 1 | -1.6 |
| 36 | CZAPLA Dominika | D D D D D | D | 1.5 | 0 | -1.5 |
| 37 | RIDLEY Alan P. | D D D D D D | D | 1.3 | 0 | -1.3 |
| 38 | HU Yingli | D D D D D | D | 0.4 | 0 | -0.4 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.