Brandeis University - Boston, MA, USA
Note: Color boxes represent opponent difficulty from the fencer's perspective. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | JIMENEZ Naveen | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 4.2 | 6 | +1.8 |
| 2 | LAO Kevin | D V V V V D | V V V V V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 3 | AMRANI David | D D V V V V | V V V V D | 4.9 | 4 | -0.9 |
| 3 | WANG Rory | V V V V V | V V V D | 3.0 | 5 | +2.0 |
| 5 | ZHAO Brandon | V V V V D V | V V V D | 3.5 | 5 | +1.5 |
| 6 | GREENLEAF Paul | V V D V V V | V V V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
| 7 | TIBBETTS Justin | V V V D V V | V V V D | 2.4 | 5 | +2.6 |
| 8 | CHUA Kirby | D V V D V | V V V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 9 | ZHUANG Chuanxuan | V V V V V V | V D | 4.5 | 6 | +1.5 |
| 10 | WOHLERS Trevor | V V V V D V | V V D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
| 11 | MURDOCH ROY Charlie | V D V V V | V V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
| 12 | MUNDAHL Brandon D. | V V D V V | V V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
| 13 | HOLCOMB Cedric | D V V D V V | V V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 14 | ABANILLA Luke | V D V V D | V V D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
| 15 | BISHOP Henry | D V D V D V | V V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
| 16 | RIPA Joseph K. | V D D D V | V V D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 17 | DENG Kenny | V V V V V | D | 3.2 | 5 | +1.8 |
| 18 | VO Jonathan | V V V V V | D | 3.4 | 5 | +1.6 |
| 19 | LIGH Thomas | V V V V V | D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
| 20 | ZHENG Harrison | V V V V D V | V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
| 21 | GE Daniel | V V V D V | V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
| 22 | TAM Kyle | V V D V V | V D | 1.8 | 4 | +2.2 |
| 23 | LACHAPELLE Cole | D V V D V V | V D | 4.7 | 4 | -0.7 |
| 24 | KROLEWSKI Alexander | V V V V D D | V D | 2.7 | 4 | +1.3 |
| 25 | YEE Michael | D V V V D | V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 25 | GARDOS Noah | V V D D V | V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 27 | TRINH Tan | D V V V D | V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 28 | CUTLER Andrew | V D D V V | V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 29 | SULLIVAN Redmond | V V D V D | V D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 30 | KONDOR James | V D D V V D | V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 31 | SAMMATARO Corey | V D D V D V | V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 32 | WILSON Samuel S. | D V V D D | V D | 3.3 | 2 | -1.3 |
| 33 | HARRIS Noah | V V D D V | D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 34 | JEFF Ariff | V D D V V D | D | 3.7 | 3 | -0.7 |
| 35 | PETINO Leonardo | V D D D V V | D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
| 36 | STAFFORD Gareth | V D V D V D | D | 1.3 | 3 | +1.7 |
| 37 | LIGH Jack | D D V D V | D | 4.1 | 2 | -2.1 |
| 38 | DEROSA Patrick | V D D V D | D | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
| 39 | WEINTROUB Ezra | D D V V D | D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
| 40 | POLLIO Benjamin | D V V D D | D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 41 | XU Brian | D V D V D D | D | 0.8 | 2 | +1.2 |
| 42 | HO Jor Sam | D D D V D V | D | 3.7 | 2 | -1.7 |
| 43 | MCENTEE Owen | D D D D V V | D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
| 44 | SFINTESCU Alex | D D V D D | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
| 45 | HOWARD Fox | D D D D V | D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 |
| 46 | SUBBIAH Sidharth | D D D V D | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 47 | HORAN Nicolas | D V D D D D | D | 3.4 | 1 | -2.4 |
| 48 | ROWAN Danny | V D D D D D | D | 3.2 | 1 | -2.2 |
| 49 | REN Leo B. | D D D V D D | D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
| 50 | MARSHALL Henry | D D D D D D | D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
| 51 | LAI Aaron | D D D D D | D | 1.0 | 0 | -1.0 |
| 52 | BERETICH Brian | D D D D D D | D | 2.0 | 0 | -2.0 |
| 53 | WALSH Frederic | D D D D D | D | 1.3 | 0 | -1.3 |
| 54 | DANGELO Connor | D D D D D | D | 0.4 | 0 | -0.4 |
| 55 | CUTLER Thomas Scott | D D D D D | D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
| 56 | ANDERSON Maxwell | D D D D D D | D | 2.7 | 0 | -2.7 |
| 57 | KAPLOWITZ Eric | D D D D D | D | 2.0 | 0 | -2.0 |
| 58 | SANCHEZ-HERNANDEZ Alex | D D D D D D | D | 0.4 | 0 | -0.4 |
Color coded boxes represent the difficulty of an opponent from the perspective of the fencer according to table below. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of victory |
|---|---|---|
| Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Roughly even | 40% to 60% | |
| Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
This visual map of the competition helps to understand:
Ignoring differences in styles, you should be winning your bouts against easier opponents and shouldn't be upset if you lose against stronger opponents.