Brandeis University - Boston, MA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | JIMENEZ Naveen | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 4.2 | 6 | +1.8 |
| 2 | LAO Kevin | D V V V V D | V V V V V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 3 | AMRANI David | D D V V V V | V V V V D | 4.9 | 4 | -0.9 |
| 3 | WANG Rory | V V V V V | V V V D | 3.0 | 5 | +2.0 |
| 5 | ZHAO Brandon | V V V V D V | V V V D | 3.5 | 5 | +1.5 |
| 6 | GREENLEAF Paul | V V D V V V | V V V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
| 7 | TIBBETTS Justin | V V V D V V | V V V D | 2.4 | 5 | +2.6 |
| 8 | CHUA Kirby | D V V D V | V V V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 9 | ZHUANG Chuanxuan | V V V V V V | V D | 4.5 | 6 | +1.5 |
| 10 | WOHLERS Trevor | V V V V D V | V V D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
| 11 | MURDOCH ROY Charlie | V D V V V | V V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
| 12 | MUNDAHL Brandon D. | V V D V V | V V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
| 13 | HOLCOMB Cedric | D V V D V V | V V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 14 | ABANILLA Luke | V D V V D | V V D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
| 15 | BISHOP Henry | D V D V D V | V V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
| 16 | RIPA Joseph K. | V D D D V | V V D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 17 | DENG Kenny | V V V V V | D | 3.2 | 5 | +1.8 |
| 18 | VO Jonathan | V V V V V | D | 3.4 | 5 | +1.6 |
| 19 | LIGH Thomas | V V V V V | D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
| 20 | ZHENG Harrison | V V V V D V | V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
| 21 | GE Daniel | V V V D V | V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
| 22 | TAM Kyle | V V D V V | V D | 1.8 | 4 | +2.2 |
| 23 | LACHAPELLE Cole | D V V D V V | V D | 4.7 | 4 | -0.7 |
| 24 | KROLEWSKI Alexander | V V V V D D | V D | 2.7 | 4 | +1.3 |
| 25 | YEE Michael | D V V V D | V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 25 | GARDOS Noah | V V D D V | V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 27 | TRINH Tan | D V V V D | V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 28 | CUTLER Andrew | V D D V V | V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 29 | SULLIVAN Redmond | V V D V D | V D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 30 | KONDOR James | V D D V V D | V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 31 | SAMMATARO Corey | V D D V D V | V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 32 | WILSON Samuel S. | D V V D D | V D | 3.3 | 2 | -1.3 |
| 33 | HARRIS Noah | V V D D V | D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 34 | JEFF Ariff | V D D V V D | D | 3.7 | 3 | -0.7 |
| 35 | PETINO Leonardo | V D D D V V | D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
| 36 | STAFFORD Gareth | V D V D V D | D | 1.3 | 3 | +1.7 |
| 37 | LIGH Jack | D D V D V | D | 4.1 | 2 | -2.1 |
| 38 | DEROSA Patrick | V D D V D | D | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
| 39 | WEINTROUB Ezra | D D V V D | D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
| 40 | POLLIO Benjamin | D V V D D | D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 41 | XU Brian | D V D V D D | D | 0.8 | 2 | +1.2 |
| 42 | HO Jor Sam | D D D V D V | D | 3.7 | 2 | -1.7 |
| 43 | MCENTEE Owen | D D D D V V | D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
| 44 | SFINTESCU Alex | D D V D D | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
| 45 | HOWARD Fox | D D D D V | D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 |
| 46 | SUBBIAH Sidharth | D D D V D | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 47 | HORAN Nicolas | D V D D D D | D | 3.4 | 1 | -2.4 |
| 48 | ROWAN Danny | V D D D D D | D | 3.2 | 1 | -2.2 |
| 49 | REN Leo B. | D D D V D D | D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
| 50 | MARSHALL Henry | D D D D D D | D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
| 51 | LAI Aaron | D D D D D | D | 1.0 | 0 | -1.0 |
| 52 | BERETICH Brian | D D D D D D | D | 2.0 | 0 | -2.0 |
| 53 | WALSH Frederic | D D D D D | D | 1.3 | 0 | -1.3 |
| 54 | DANGELO Connor | D D D D D | D | 0.4 | 0 | -0.4 |
| 55 | CUTLER Thomas Scott | D D D D D | D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
| 56 | ANDERSON Maxwell | D D D D D D | D | 2.7 | 0 | -2.7 |
| 57 | KAPLOWITZ Eric | D D D D D | D | 2.0 | 0 | -2.0 |
| 58 | SANCHEZ-HERNANDEZ Alex | D D D D D D | D | 0.4 | 0 | -0.4 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.