Brandeis University - Boston, MA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | JIMENEZ Naveen | - | - | 3% | 19% | 40% | 31% | 7% |
| 2 | LAO Kevin | - | 1% | 10% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 5% |
| 3 | AMRANI David | - | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 44% | 25% |
| 3 | WANG Rory | - | 6% | 23% | 38% | 27% | 7% | |
| 5 | ZHAO Brandon | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 15% | 2% |
| 6 | GREENLEAF Paul | - | 2% | 9% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 6% |
| 7 | TIBBETTS Justin | 2% | 16% | 37% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 8 | CHUA Kirby | - | 2% | 16% | 39% | 34% | 9% | |
| 9 | ZHUANG Chuanxuan | - | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 37% | 17% |
| 10 | WOHLERS Trevor | - | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 32% | 11% |
| 11 | MURDOCH ROY Charlie | - | 4% | 20% | 38% | 30% | 8% | |
| 12 | MUNDAHL Brandon D. | - | - | 3% | 19% | 44% | 33% | |
| 13 | HOLCOMB Cedric | - | 1% | 9% | 24% | 35% | 24% | 6% |
| 14 | ABANILLA Luke | 3% | 18% | 37% | 31% | 10% | 1% | |
| 15 | BISHOP Henry | - | 2% | 12% | 33% | 35% | 15% | 2% |
| 16 | RIPA Joseph K. | 2% | 23% | 43% | 26% | 6% | - | |
| 17 | DENG Kenny | - | 2% | 18% | 40% | 32% | 8% | |
| 18 | VO Jonathan | - | 2% | 14% | 35% | 36% | 13% | |
| 19 | LIGH Thomas | - | 1% | 6% | 29% | 46% | 19% | |
| 20 | ZHENG Harrison | - | 1% | 10% | 27% | 36% | 21% | 4% |
| 21 | GE Daniel | - | 2% | 15% | 40% | 35% | 9% | |
| 22 | TAM Kyle | 9% | 30% | 38% | 19% | 4% | - | |
| 23 | LACHAPELLE Cole | - | - | 2% | 9% | 27% | 39% | 22% |
| 24 | KROLEWSKI Alexander | 1% | 10% | 32% | 36% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 25 | YEE Michael | - | 1% | 12% | 36% | 38% | 12% | |
| 25 | GARDOS Noah | - | 2% | 14% | 33% | 36% | 14% | |
| 27 | TRINH Tan | - | 5% | 20% | 36% | 30% | 9% | |
| 28 | CUTLER Andrew | - | 6% | 22% | 37% | 28% | 7% | |
| 29 | SULLIVAN Redmond | 1% | 9% | 35% | 38% | 15% | 2% | |
| 30 | KONDOR James | 1% | 6% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 11% | 2% |
| 31 | SAMMATARO Corey | 1% | 9% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
| 32 | WILSON Samuel S. | - | 3% | 17% | 38% | 33% | 9% | |
| 33 | HARRIS Noah | 2% | 14% | 35% | 33% | 13% | 2% | |
| 34 | JEFF Ariff | - | 1% | 11% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 4% |
| 35 | PETINO Leonardo | 5% | 29% | 41% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 36 | STAFFORD Gareth | 21% | 39% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 37 | LIGH Jack | - | - | 3% | 19% | 44% | 34% | |
| 38 | DEROSA Patrick | 22% | 49% | 23% | 4% | - | - | |
| 39 | WEINTROUB Ezra | 8% | 40% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 40 | POLLIO Benjamin | 2% | 16% | 35% | 32% | 13% | 2% | |
| 41 | XU Brian | 40% | 41% | 16% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 42 | HO Jor Sam | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 4% |
| 43 | MCENTEE Owen | 11% | 38% | 35% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 44 | SFINTESCU Alex | 22% | 41% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 45 | HOWARD Fox | 3% | 15% | 31% | 32% | 16% | 3% | |
| 46 | SUBBIAH Sidharth | 15% | 37% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 47 | HORAN Nicolas | - | 3% | 17% | 34% | 32% | 12% | 1% |
| 48 | ROWAN Danny | - | 5% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 1% |
| 49 | REN Leo B. | 4% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 50 | MARSHALL Henry | 45% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 51 | LAI Aaron | 30% | 45% | 21% | 4% | - | - | |
| 52 | BERETICH Brian | 3% | 29% | 40% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 53 | WALSH Frederic | 19% | 41% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 54 | DANGELO Connor | 65% | 30% | 4% | - | - | - | |
| 55 | CUTLER Thomas Scott | 49% | 42% | 8% | 1% | - | - | |
| 56 | ANDERSON Maxwell | 1% | 11% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 57 | KAPLOWITZ Eric | 6% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 6% | - | |
| 58 | SANCHEZ-HERNANDEZ Alex | 68% | 28% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.