Brandeis University - Boston, MA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | MUNGOVAN Matthew | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 26% | 5% |
| 2 | RYAN Kai | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 36% | 5% |
| 3 | CHENG Brandon | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 39% | 10% |
| 3 | BADUSHOV Anton | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 35% | 6% | |
| 5 | PANEPINTO HATTORI Fernando | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 39% | 10% |
| 6 | LAUB William | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 51% | 18% | 3% |
| 7 | ROLLOCK Jonathan B. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 75% | 33% |
| 8 | DRZEWICZEWSKI Sean | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 9 | EPLETT Nicholas | 100% | 92% | 63% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 10 | FLUECKIGER Michael | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 31% | 4% |
| 11 | TAUER Sam | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 41% | 12% | 1% |
| 12 | PANNOZZO Luca | 100% | 98% | 79% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 13 | ZONG Yujie | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 76% | 34% |
| 14 | COUNTS Nicholas | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 47% | 16% | 2% |
| 15 | PODDAR Shameek | 100% | 93% | 66% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 16 | COURTIN Frederic | 100% | 100% | 94% | 74% | 39% | 11% | 1% |
| 17 | CHIN Nigel | 100% | 97% | 79% | 42% | 11% | 1% | |
| 18 | DZIALO George A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 28% | |
| 19 | DAHL Chris | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 39% | 8% |
| 20 | JAVIDI Michael | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 17% | 2% |
| 21 | TOUSSAINT Alexander | 100% | 89% | 54% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 22 | ZISLIN Benjamin | 100% | 79% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 23 | JOHNSON Colin | 100% | 90% | 58% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 24 | AISSIS John G. | 100% | 66% | 24% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 25 | DUMOULIN Gabriel | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 25% | 4% |
| 26 | STEVENSON David | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 37% | 8% |
| 27 | DUARTE PALOMINO Miguel | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 30% | 5% | |
| 28 | SMITH Adam | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 29 | GORMLEY Peter J. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 37% | 10% | 1% |
| 30 | ANSARI Umayr | 100% | 71% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 31 | HORAN Daniel J. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 35% | 10% | 1% |
| 32 | AVRAMIS Adam | 100% | 46% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 33 | MCCALL Aidan | 100% | 81% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 34 | IDE Ben | 100% | 84% | 45% | 12% | 1% | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.