Phoenix Convention Center - Phoenix, AZ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | DAVIS Jessica L. | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 6% |
| 2 | PAPADAKIS Lily | - | 4% | 16% | 33% | 34% | 14% | |
| 3 | MAO Amy | - | - | 3% | 12% | 29% | 37% | 19% |
| 3 | CHEN Lefu | - | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 44% | 18% |
| 5 | BEI Karen | - | - | - | 5% | 22% | 43% | 30% |
| 6 | YU Nicole J. | - | - | 4% | 16% | 34% | 34% | 12% |
| 7 | BUECHEL Holly M. | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 8% |
| 8 | CAPELLUA Mariasole | - | 5% | 21% | 36% | 29% | 8% | |
| 9 | PEHLIVANI Zara | - | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 39% | 17% |
| 10 | ZUHARS Renee A. | - | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 41% | 34% |
| 11 | SMUK Alexandra S. | 3% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 13% | 2% | |
| 12 | WANG Zoe | 7% | 32% | 38% | 18% | 4% | < 1% | - |
| 13 | GEBALA Natalie Brooke A. | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 39% | 19% | |
| 14 | WELLS Tesla M. | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 34% | 15% | 2% |
| 15 | WITTER Catherine A. | - | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 32% | 11% |
| 16 | EDWARDS Auprell | 2% | 12% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 4% | |
| 17 | LEE Natasha | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 37% | 16% | |
| 18 | LOMBARD Ella | - | - | - | 4% | 19% | 42% | 34% |
| 19 | SMITH Grace L. | - | - | 2% | 10% | 29% | 40% | 20% |
| 20 | MCCUTCHEN Lauren (Lulu) | - | 2% | 9% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 6% |
| 21 | CALDERA Lexi I. | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 5% |
| 22 | WADE-CURRIE Ava S. | - | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 35% | 14% |
| 23 | YANG Alisa | - | 5% | 20% | 37% | 30% | 8% | |
| 24 | LAN Alice S. | - | 1% | 5% | 18% | 34% | 31% | 11% |
| 25 | YOU Emily | 2% | 13% | 31% | 33% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 26 | BOURDEAU Emily B. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 40% | 29% |
| 27 | KENT Elizabeth J. | 3% | 15% | 31% | 31% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 28 | BUSH emma | 1% | 11% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
| 29 | ISERT Sarah | - | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 42% | 27% |
| 30 | WONG Alexandra R. | - | 4% | 19% | 34% | 30% | 11% | 2% |
| 31 | BALAKRISHNAN Trisha | 12% | 32% | 34% | 18% | 4% | 1% | - |
| 32 | HEPLER Sarah | 6% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 7% | 1% | |
| 33 | NEMETH Katherine | - | 3% | 13% | 29% | 33% | 18% | 4% |
| 34 | DOROSHKEVICH Victoriia | - | - | 3% | 13% | 31% | 36% | 16% |
| 35 | HANSEN Kira | - | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 36% | 13% |
| 36 | KALE Anika A. | - | 1% | 8% | 23% | 34% | 26% | 8% |
| 37 | REID Anousheh | - | 1% | 5% | 18% | 35% | 31% | 10% |
| 38 | DU Eiry | - | 1% | 9% | 25% | 35% | 23% | 6% |
| 39 | YAO Yilin | 4% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 13% | 2% | |
| 40 | GUMAGAY Erika L. | - | 5% | 20% | 36% | 30% | 9% | |
| 41 | REID Sobia | - | 1% | 7% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 8% |
| 42 | ZHOU Wenjun | 1% | 5% | 18% | 31% | 29% | 14% | 2% |
| 43 | FOELLMER Kristin | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 43% | 37% |
| 44 | SHU Youshan | - | 5% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 2% |
| 45 | SMUK Daria A. | 1% | 6% | 19% | 32% | 28% | 13% | 2% |
| 46 | CANNING Charlotte | 1% | 12% | 32% | 35% | 17% | 3% | |
| 47 | CARRIER Meredith | 10% | 31% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - | |
| 48 | WATTANAKIT Anda | 2% | 14% | 29% | 31% | 18% | 5% | 1% |
| 49 | MALLAVARPU Aarthi C. | - | 1% | 9% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 5% |
| 50 | LIN Elaine | - | 4% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 15% | 3% |
| 51 | SHELIN Chelsea | 1% | 9% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 8% | 1% |
| 52 | FURMAN Maria | - | 5% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 11% | 2% |
| 53 | POTAPENKO Margarita D. | - | 2% | 11% | 26% | 33% | 21% | 5% |
| 54 | LIANG Jingjing | 8% | 29% | 36% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 55 | MOON Seojung | 3% | 16% | 31% | 30% | 15% | 4% | - |
| 56 | ABRAMSON Mariela R. | 5% | 23% | 36% | 25% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 57 | FENG ge | 3% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 13% | 2% | |
| 58 | GAO Judy | 5% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 9% | 1% | |
| 59 | NELSON-LOVE Lily B. | 2% | 12% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 4% | |
| 60 | MONTOYA Kimberlee C. | - | - | 4% | 20% | 42% | 33% | |
| 61 | LEE Samantha X. | 12% | 31% | 33% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 62 | WONG Caitlin | 32% | 42% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 63 | LEE Yedda | 2% | 13% | 29% | 32% | 18% | 5% | 1% |
| 64 | CHERNIS Zoe C. | 7% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 6% | 1% | |
| 65 | KUMAR Eva | 2% | 14% | 31% | 32% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 66 | GITHENS Gracyn J. | - | 3% | 15% | 31% | 32% | 15% | 3% |
| 67 | RUNIONS Emersyn | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 3% |
| 68 | MUNOZ Andrea H. | 2% | 15% | 32% | 31% | 15% | 4% | - |
| 69 | PRIHODKO Nina | 1% | 8% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 8% | 1% |
| 70 | LIU Nicole | 2% | 12% | 28% | 32% | 19% | 6% | 1% |
| 71 | SPRINGER Sierra | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 35% | 30% | 10% |
| 72 | POLANICHKA Nicole | - | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 35% | 14% |
| 73 | LAWSON Marie A. | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 35% | 28% | 8% |
| 74 | MILEWSKI Nicole | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 6% |
| 75 | BARG Daniella | - | 4% | 18% | 37% | 31% | 9% | 1% |
| 76 | BENZAN India | 4% | 18% | 32% | 29% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 77 | BOTNER Olivia | 2% | 10% | 25% | 32% | 22% | 8% | 1% |
| 78 | HABERKERN Kundry E. | - | 1% | 9% | 25% | 36% | 23% | 6% |
| 79 | HICKS Grace | 2% | 12% | 29% | 33% | 19% | 5% | - |
| 80 | TAN Jocelyn | 2% | 11% | 27% | 33% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
| 81 | YOU Isabel B. | 9% | 32% | 36% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 82 | SCHMID Carola K. | 1% | 13% | 32% | 34% | 16% | 3% | |
| 83 | ASHER Valerie | 1% | 7% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 6% | |
| 84 | CHANG Celine A. | 18% | 38% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | |
| 85 | SUN Renee R. | 1% | 6% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
| 86 | SCHULTZ Gillian | 2% | 12% | 28% | 33% | 20% | 5% | 1% |
| 86 | PINNAMANENI Drithi | 5% | 19% | 32% | 28% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 88 | NELSON Grace E. | 45% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 89 | KINDEL Amara | 17% | 37% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 90 | DESAI Meera P. | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 36% | 17% | 3% |
| 91 | ZHEREBCHEVSKA Veronika | 3% | 16% | 30% | 30% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 92 | YAO KATHARINE | 10% | 35% | 36% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 93 | HUANG Lanlan | 2% | 13% | 29% | 32% | 18% | 5% | 1% |
| 94 | CHA Eugenie | 1% | 8% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
| 95 | CHENG Ava | 1% | 9% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
| 96 | HSIU Elizabeth | 8% | 30% | 36% | 20% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 97 | SCHULTZ Michelle M. | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 30% | 10% | 1% |
| 98 | MARTYNOVA Diana | 16% | 36% | 31% | 13% | 3% | - | |
| 99 | CHOI Grace | 2% | 15% | 35% | 32% | 14% | 2% | |
| 100 | ENRILE Erica | 9% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 101 | MONTOYA Amy C. | 1% | 6% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 10% | 1% |
| 102 | STOECKEL Sofia I. | 2% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 102 | LAI Amanda | 41% | 42% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 104 | ZHAO Alina | 9% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 105 | LI Charlotte | 27% | 41% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 106 | MEYER Rachel | 42% | 41% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 107 | DAYAL Saahira | 33% | 42% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 108 | KORKIN Alice | 9% | 31% | 35% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 109 | SHARMA Sanvi | 4% | 24% | 40% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 110 | TANG Sze Nga Nicole | 9% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 111 | HESS Heidi J. | 2% | 13% | 31% | 33% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 112 | ZOU You yang (Yoyo) | 34% | 42% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 113 | DUONG Zoey | 16% | 35% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 114 | MIINEA Elena | 10% | 37% | 35% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 115 | HOFMAN Haejung | 1% | 9% | 25% | 33% | 23% | 8% | 1% |
| 116 | GORDET Cristina G. | 3% | 19% | 37% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 117 | CAREY Michele S. | 6% | 21% | 33% | 26% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 118 | LI Fei | 5% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 119 | POON Desiree | 54% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
| 120 | PHUKAN Indra | 19% | 39% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - | |
| 121 | HAU Olivia | 23% | 39% | 26% | 9% | 2% | - | - |
| 122 | CHANG Chloe | 31% | 42% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.