Phoenix Convention Center - Phoenix, AZ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | WYSZYNSKI Marek B. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 89% | |
| 2 | FOELLMER Oliver K. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 68% | |
| 3 | SUAREZ Rafael A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% |
| 3 | KOEHN Ted | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 83% | 8% | |
| 5 | OLIVARES Frets G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 58% | |
| 6 | ANDERSON Nathan T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 58% |
| 7 | LEE Tobias (Toby) T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 67% | 16% | |
| 8 | PIMOUTKINE Roustam R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 69% | |
| 9 | CHO Michael | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 22% | |
| 10 | GEARHART Andrew (Andy) R. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 81% | 28% | 2% | |
| 11 | POWERS Douglas A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 61% | 19% | 2% |
| 12 | YANG David | 100% | 80% | 39% | 10% | 1% | < 1% | - |
| 13 | KISSINGFORD John F. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 52% | 3% |
| 14 | POPOKH Leo | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 71% | 15% | |
| 15 | SUAREZ Rolando | 100% | 99% | 86% | 45% | 4% | - | |
| 16 | PHILLIPS Jasper | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 49% | 13% | 1% |
| 17 | WU Clarence C. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 80% | 30% | 3% | |
| 18 | KRYLTSOV Greg | 100% | 97% | 76% | 31% | 2% | - | |
| 19 | VALENTINE Iain | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 23% | 3% | - |
| 20 | BORG Daniel | 100% | 68% | 22% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 21 | GREENLEAF John | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 23% | 3% | - |
| 22 | HERNANDEZ Marc A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 51% | 10% |
| 23 | BERKE Daniel (Dan) L. | 100% | 99% | 81% | 22% | 1% | - | |
| 24 | RUSANOV Oleg | 100% | 96% | 69% | 23% | 1% | - | |
| 25 | PAPP Mike | 100% | 94% | 49% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 26 | JEFFCOAT Timothy | 100% | 81% | 36% | 6% | - | - | |
| 27 | TOWSTER Robert | 100% | 93% | 62% | 18% | 2% | - | - |
| 28 | WEIL Brent | 100% | 98% | 80% | 35% | 3% | - | |
| 29 | NEWELL Tim | 100% | 61% | 16% | 1% | - | - | |
| 30 | BERGER Jamie | 100% | 73% | 27% | 4% | - | - | |
| 31 | MAHNKEN Thomas G. | 100% | 97% | 66% | 16% | 1% | - | |
| 32 | THOGERSEN Eric J. | 100% | 87% | 53% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 33 | ALLAN Peter L. | 100% | 70% | 22% | 2% | - | - | |
| 34 | CHAO Pierre | 100% | 87% | 24% | 2% | - | - | |
| 35 | ORNELAS Polo | 100% | 23% | 2% | - | - | - | |
| 36 | WEMPLE Charles | 100% | 24% | 1% | - | - | - | |
| 37 | O'CONNOR Ryan (Ryan O'Connor) D. | 100% | 97% | 79% | 43% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 37 | ZAIDI Sohail | 100% | 77% | 32% | 6% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.