Indianapolis Fencing Club - Indianapolis, IN, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | ||
1 | THOMAS Samuel | - | - | 1% | 16% | 83% |
2 | PAMERLEAU Ian | - | - | 6% | 46% | 48% |
3 | CARDENAS Nathan A. | - | 1% | 23% | 51% | 24% |
3 | MACNEIL Matthew | 12% | 42% | 41% | 5% | - |
5 | SPURGEON William | 2% | 33% | 52% | 13% | < 1% |
6 | LAUER Michael | - | 2% | 16% | 45% | 37% |
7 | HOSTETTER Gerrit | 1% | 26% | 45% | 24% | 4% |
8 | ADKINS Jerry | - | 1% | 14% | 51% | 33% |
9 | STOCK Olivia | 21% | 44% | 29% | 6% | - |
10 | PLUMMER Ken | 40% | 44% | 14% | 1% | - |
11 | REEN Stephen | 17% | 47% | 31% | 5% | - |
12 | ATWELL Madelyn | 82% | 17% | 1% | - | - |
12 | STAUBITZ Marc | 1% | 8% | 36% | 49% | 6% |
14 | DAWES Isabel | 42% | 50% | 8% | - | - |
15 | DUTTON Kitty | 4% | 40% | 46% | 10% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.