Indianapolis Fencing Club - Indianapolis, IN, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | ||
1 | THOMAS Samuel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 83% |
2 | PAMERLEAU Ian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 48% |
3 | CARDENAS Nathan A. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 75% | 24% |
3 | MACNEIL Matthew | 100% | 88% | 46% | 5% | - |
5 | SPURGEON William | 100% | 98% | 66% | 13% | < 1% |
6 | LAUER Michael | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 37% |
7 | HOSTETTER Gerrit | 100% | 99% | 73% | 28% | 4% |
8 | ADKINS Jerry | 100% | 100% | 99% | 84% | 33% |
9 | STOCK Olivia | 100% | 79% | 35% | 6% | - |
10 | PLUMMER Ken | 100% | 60% | 16% | 1% | - |
11 | REEN Stephen | 100% | 83% | 36% | 5% | - |
12 | ATWELL Madelyn | 100% | 18% | 1% | - | - |
12 | STAUBITZ Marc | 100% | 99% | 91% | 55% | 6% |
14 | DAWES Isabel | 100% | 58% | 8% | - | - |
15 | DUTTON Kitty | 100% | 96% | 56% | 10% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.