Belleville High School - Belleville, MI, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | ||
1 | KAISER Hans Z. | - | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 51% | 39% |
2 | FORTUNE Alexander J. | - | - | - | 3% | 16% | 43% | 39% | |
3 | MCISAAC Finn | - | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 43% | 21% | |
3 | BROUGHAM Samuel | - | - | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 33% | 11% |
5 | HAMILTON Brock B. | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 4% | |
6 | NYKAMP Caleb | - | - | 1% | 14% | 46% | 32% | 6% | |
7 | LIU Ethan | - | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 35% | 14% | |
8 | EDWARDS Maxon | - | 3% | 21% | 43% | 27% | 5% | - | |
9 | ALLEN Henry G. | - | - | 1% | 5% | 24% | 44% | 26% | |
10 | PALMA Matthew Dominic | - | - | 2% | 14% | 35% | 37% | 12% | |
11 | SHEVCHENKO Kostiantyn | - | 4% | 16% | 30% | 31% | 16% | 3% | |
12 | GATRELL Mitchell E. | - | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 42% | 31% | |
13 | PALMA Nathan Anthony | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 6% | |
14 | KUE Temujin | 3% | 19% | 38% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - | |
15 | KENNEDY Christo | - | 4% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 2% | |
16 | COPELAND Nigel | 1% | 13% | 32% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - | |
17 | CAMPBELL June | - | 2% | 9% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 7% | |
18 | DEDENBACH Joseph | - | - | 3% | 17% | 38% | 33% | 7% | |
19 | TOWNE Benjamin | - | 9% | 30% | 38% | 19% | 3% | - | |
20 | SORRENTINO Salvatore | 1% | 9% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 5% | - | |
21 | GNEUHS Sam | - | 6% | 23% | 35% | 25% | 9% | 1% | |
22 | LEE Ian | 5% | 26% | 41% | 23% | 4% | - | - | |
23 | DIEPSTRA Jeremy | 3% | 18% | 36% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | |
26 | GREEN Zachary J. | 3% | 15% | 31% | 32% | 16% | 4% | - | |
26 | POGOSIAN Roman | 2% | 17% | 35% | 31% | 13% | 2% | - | |
28 | AADHI Hansika | 2% | 12% | 29% | 33% | 19% | 5% | - | |
29 | FOXWORTH John P. | - | 2% | 12% | 28% | 34% | 19% | 3% | - |
30 | HICKEY Connor | 2% | 23% | 40% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
31 | VANOYEN Dominick | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 12% | 2% | |
32 | WU Benjamin (Ben) | 4% | 18% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
33 | SLUSHER Gideon | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 36% | 20% | 4% | |
34 | RIVERA Ricky N. | 10% | 32% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - | - | |
34 | LINDOW Connor | 6% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - | |
36 | OWENS Andrew J. | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 7% | |
37 | COLLINS Anna | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 38% | 28% | 5% | |
38 | RODRIGUEZ JR Martin | - | - | 2% | 12% | 34% | 39% | 12% | |
38 | STONE Sydney | - | 2% | 12% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 4% | |
40 | HAN Ethan | - | 4% | 17% | 30% | 30% | 15% | 3% | - |
41 | YEE Michael | 1% | 7% | 22% | 35% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - |
42 | TAN Dorathy | 2% | 11% | 28% | 33% | 20% | 6% | 1% | |
43 | BASS Nathan | 3% | 19% | 36% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - | |
44 | MORSE Katherine | 20% | 39% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - | - | |
45 | MCGRATH Polina S. | 13% | 33% | 33% | 17% | 4% | 1% | - | - |
46 | NAZARIO Dominic | 5% | 21% | 36% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - | |
46 | BETHEA Chase | 4% | 22% | 36% | 26% | 10% | 2% | - | |
48 | HAN Katherine | 4% | 33% | 53% | 9% | - | - | - | |
49 | ATKINSON Josiah | 1% | 9% | 24% | 32% | 23% | 9% | 1% | |
50 | OWENS Carrie M. | 1% | 26% | 42% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | |
51 | HAGOPIAN Mitchell | 4% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - | |
52 | KIM Ethan | - | 6% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 1% | |
53 | LOWTHER Imogen | 32% | 44% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - | |
53 | MALVESTUTO Evelyn | 50% | 38% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - | |
55 | MICK Gabriel | 44% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - | |
56 | EDWARDS Connor | 18% | 39% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | - | |
57 | KIM Adrian | 16% | 42% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.