Belleville High School - Belleville, MI, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | KAISER Hans Z. | V V V V V V V | V V V V V | 6.3 | 7 | +0.7 |
2 | FORTUNE Alexander J. | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 5.2 | 6 | +0.8 |
3 | MCISAAC Finn | V V V V V V | V V V D | 4.8 | 6 | +1.2 |
3 | BROUGHAM Samuel | V V V V V V D | V V V D | 5.3 | 6 | +0.7 |
5 | HAMILTON Brock B. | V V V V V V | V V D | 3.8 | 6 | +2.2 |
6 | NYKAMP Caleb | D V V V V V | V V D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
7 | LIU Ethan | V V V D V V | V V V D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
8 | EDWARDS Maxon | V D V V V D | V V V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
9 | ALLEN Henry G. | V V V V V V | V D | 4.9 | 6 | +1.1 |
10 | PALMA Matthew Dominic | V V V V D V | V V D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
11 | SHEVCHENKO Kostiantyn | D V V V D V | V V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
12 | GATRELL Mitchell E. | V V V D D V | V V D | 5.0 | 4 | -1.0 |
13 | PALMA Nathan Anthony | D V D V V V | V V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
14 | KUE Temujin | D V V V V D | V V D | 2.2 | 4 | +1.8 |
15 | KENNEDY Christo | V V V D D V | V V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
16 | COPELAND Nigel | V V D D V V | V V D | 2.6 | 4 | +1.4 |
17 | CAMPBELL June | V V V V D V | V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
18 | DEDENBACH Joseph | V D V V V D | V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
19 | TOWNE Benjamin | D D V V V V | V D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
20 | SORRENTINO Salvatore | D V D V V V | V D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
21 | GNEUHS Sam | V V D D V V | V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
22 | LEE Ian | V V D D V V | V D | 2.0 | 4 | +2.0 |
23 | DIEPSTRA Jeremy | D D V D V V | V D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
26 | GREEN Zachary J. | V D D V V D | V D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
26 | POGOSIAN Roman | V D D V V D | V D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
28 | AADHI Hansika | V D V V D D | V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
29 | FOXWORTH John P. | V V D D V D D | V D | 3.7 | 3 | -0.7 |
30 | HICKEY Connor | V D D V D D V | V D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
31 | VANOYEN Dominick | D V D D V D | V D | 3.3 | 2 | -1.3 |
32 | WU Benjamin (Ben) | D D V D D D D | V D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 |
33 | SLUSHER Gideon | V V D D V V | D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
34 | RIVERA Ricky N. | D V V D V D | D | 1.8 | 3 | +1.2 |
34 | LINDOW Connor | D V D V V D | D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
36 | OWENS Andrew J. | D D V V V D | D | 4.0 | 3 | -1.0 |
37 | COLLINS Anna | D D V D V V | D | 4.0 | 3 | -1.0 |
38 | RODRIGUEZ JR Martin | V D V V D D | D | 4.5 | 3 | -1.5 |
38 | STONE Sydney | V V V D D D | D | 3.7 | 3 | -0.7 |
40 | HAN Ethan | D D D V V V D | D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
41 | YEE Michael | D D V D D V V | D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
42 | TAN Dorathy | V V D D D D | D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
43 | BASS Nathan | V D D V D D | D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
44 | MORSE Katherine | D V D D D V | D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
45 | MCGRATH Polina S. | D V D D D D V | D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
46 | NAZARIO Dominic | D D D D D V | D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
46 | BETHEA Chase | D D D D V D | D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
48 | HAN Katherine | D D V D D D | D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
49 | ATKINSON Josiah | D D D V D D | D | 3.0 | 1 | -2.0 |
50 | OWENS Carrie M. | D D D D V D | D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
51 | HAGOPIAN Mitchell | D D V D D D | D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
52 | KIM Ethan | D V D D D D | D | 3.1 | 1 | -2.1 |
53 | LOWTHER Imogen | D D D D D D | D | 1.0 | 0 | -1.0 |
53 | MALVESTUTO Evelyn | D D D D D D | D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
55 | MICK Gabriel | D D D D D D | D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
56 | EDWARDS Connor | D D D D D D | D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 |
57 | KIM Adrian | D D D D D D | D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.