Northwest Fencing Center - Tigard, OR, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | FUKUDA Diego | - | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 41% | 27% |
| 2 | WONG Evan | - | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 35% | 14% |
| 3 | LU Kevin | - | - | - | 5% | 21% | 43% | 31% |
| 3 | NICOLETTI Luca | - | - | - | - | 5% | 29% | 66% |
| 5 | BAE Eugene | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 37% | 21% | 3% |
| 6 | LEE Christopher T. | - | - | - | 1% | 7% | 32% | 60% |
| 7 | PARK Rion | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 39% | 50% |
| 8 | SISINNI Leonardo | - | 3% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 13% | 2% |
| 9 | CHONG Tristan | 2% | 14% | 32% | 32% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 10 | RAUTUREAU Hugo | - | 1% | 4% | 18% | 35% | 32% | 10% |
| 11 | HAYES Stewart | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 40% | 26% | 4% |
| 12 | WU Alber Y. | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 34% | 58% |
| 13 | RAUTUREAU Arthur | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 39% | 26% | 3% |
| 14 | ZHONG Maxwell | - | 7% | 26% | 36% | 24% | 6% | - |
| 15 | CHANG Jonathan | - | - | 3% | 16% | 36% | 34% | 10% |
| 16 | CHANG Eric Jonathan | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 4% |
| 17 | LI Richard | 1% | 10% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 5% | |
| 18 | YANG Charles | - | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 42% | 24% |
| 19 | YU ZiRun (Kinton) | 1% | 6% | 22% | 36% | 28% | 8% | |
| 20 | TSAY Jordan R. | 1% | 11% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 21 | WANDJI Noah | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 33% | 12% | 1% |
| 22 | RODRIGUEZ Tyler | - | - | 3% | 13% | 32% | 37% | 16% |
| 22 | NEICE William | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 36% | 18% | 3% |
| 24 | YANG Tate | 1% | 9% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 5% | - |
| 25 | CHANG Jeremy | - | - | 4% | 18% | 38% | 32% | 7% |
| 26 | ZHAO Ryan | 2% | 19% | 38% | 29% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 27 | FUKUDA Brando | - | 1% | 9% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 3% |
| 28 | HE Ian | 1% | 11% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 5% | - |
| 29 | YU Eric | - | 5% | 21% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
| 30 | LOZANO Veyron Jericho | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 6% | |
| 31 | PARK William | 1% | 7% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
| 32 | WANG Li | 1% | 8% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 6% | |
| 33 | LE Jacob H. | - | - | 3% | 14% | 34% | 36% | 13% |
| 34 | GE Felix Fei | 1% | 9% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 35 | YOU Alan | 1% | 6% | 20% | 34% | 29% | 10% | 1% |
| 36 | YU ShiYu (Henry) | 4% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 10% | 1% | |
| 37 | ZHANG Raphael | - | 5% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 8% | - |
| 38 | HONG Edwin | 7% | 32% | 39% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 39 | HE Bourne | 7% | 26% | 37% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 40 | NAIR Sujit | 1% | 13% | 33% | 34% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 41 | PARK Jayden | 7% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 42 | WONNEBERG Luke | - | 3% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 13% | 2% |
| 43 | WANG Elijah (QiChen) | 11% | 31% | 35% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 44 | LI Edison M. | 1% | 10% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 45 | LING Carson Jr | 1% | 11% | 31% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 46 | CHANG Joseph | 62% | 31% | 6% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 47 | IYOKI Sean | 30% | 42% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 48 | CHEN Owen | 8% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 49 | YANG Arthur | 11% | 32% | 34% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 50 | YUE Jackson | 6% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 51 | YU ShiLin (Harry) | 2% | 16% | 36% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 52 | QU Zhida (richard) | - | 3% | 17% | 35% | 31% | 12% | 2% |
| 53 | SU Preston | 6% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 54 | FUNG Jace Y. | 48% | 39% | 11% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 55 | TOYOFUKU Ethan | 30% | 41% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 56 | SU Desmond | 13% | 35% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 56 | PAN Ethan | 11% | 42% | 34% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 56 | OH Christopher | 1% | 9% | 26% | 35% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
| 59 | CHOI Elliot | 68% | 27% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 60 | PAINTER Zachary | 3% | 24% | 39% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 61 | QIU Yiran | 69% | 27% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 62 | TOYOFUKU Lucas | 55% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.