Northwest Fencing Center - Tigard, OR, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | FUKUDA Diego | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 27% |
2 | WONG Evan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 14% |
3 | LU Kevin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 31% |
3 | NICOLETTI Luca | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 66% |
5 | BAE Eugene | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 25% | 3% |
6 | LEE Christopher T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 60% |
7 | PARK Rion | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 50% |
8 | SISINNI Leonardo | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 15% | 2% |
9 | CHONG Tristan | 100% | 98% | 84% | 52% | 20% | 4% | - |
10 | RAUTUREAU Hugo | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 77% | 42% | 10% |
11 | HAYES Stewart | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 30% | 4% |
12 | WU Alber Y. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 58% |
13 | RAUTUREAU Arthur | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 29% | 3% |
14 | ZHONG Maxwell | 100% | 100% | 92% | 67% | 30% | 7% | - |
15 | CHANG Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 45% | 10% |
16 | CHANG Eric Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 25% | 4% |
17 | LI Richard | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 26% | 5% | |
18 | YANG Charles | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 24% |
19 | YU ZiRun (Kinton) | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 36% | 8% | |
20 | TSAY Jordan R. | 100% | 99% | 87% | 57% | 23% | 5% | - |
21 | WANDJI Noah | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 13% | 1% |
22 | RODRIGUEZ Tyler | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 52% | 16% |
22 | NEICE William | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 21% | 3% |
24 | YANG Tate | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 24% | 5% | - |
25 | CHANG Jeremy | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 39% | 7% |
26 | ZHAO Ryan | 100% | 98% | 78% | 40% | 11% | 2% | - |
27 | FUKUDA Brando | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 26% | 3% |
28 | HE Ian | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 24% | 5% | - |
29 | YU Eric | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 38% | 10% | 1% |
30 | LOZANO Veyron Jericho | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 30% | 6% | |
31 | PARK William | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 34% | 9% | 1% |
32 | WANG Li | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 29% | 6% | |
33 | LE Jacob H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 49% | 13% |
34 | GE Felix Fei | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 27% | 6% | - |
35 | YOU Alan | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 40% | 11% | 1% |
36 | YU ShiYu (Henry) | 100% | 96% | 75% | 40% | 12% | 1% | |
37 | ZHANG Raphael | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 35% | 8% | - |
38 | HONG Edwin | 100% | 93% | 62% | 23% | 4% | - | - |
39 | HE Bourne | 100% | 93% | 68% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - |
40 | NAIR Sujit | 100% | 99% | 86% | 53% | 19% | 4% | - |
41 | PARK Jayden | 100% | 93% | 67% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - |
42 | WONNEBERG Luke | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 46% | 15% | 2% |
43 | WANG Elijah (QiChen) | 100% | 89% | 58% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - |
44 | LI Edison M. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 25% | 5% | - |
45 | LING Carson Jr | 100% | 99% | 88% | 57% | 22% | 4% | - |
46 | CHANG Joseph | 100% | 38% | 6% | 1% | - | - | - |
47 | IYOKI Sean | 100% | 70% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
48 | CHEN Owen | 100% | 92% | 64% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
49 | YANG Arthur | 100% | 89% | 57% | 22% | 5% | - | - |
50 | YUE Jackson | 100% | 94% | 69% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - |
51 | YU ShiLin (Harry) | 100% | 98% | 82% | 46% | 14% | 2% | - |
52 | QU Zhida (richard) | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 45% | 13% | 2% |
53 | SU Preston | 100% | 94% | 68% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - |
54 | FUNG Jace Y. | 100% | 52% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
55 | TOYOFUKU Ethan | 100% | 70% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - | |
56 | SU Desmond | 100% | 87% | 52% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
56 | PAN Ethan | 100% | 89% | 47% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
56 | OH Christopher | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
59 | CHOI Elliot | 100% | 32% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
60 | PAINTER Zachary | 100% | 97% | 73% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - |
61 | QIU Yiran | 100% | 31% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
62 | TOYOFUKU Lucas | 100% | 45% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.