Ontario Convention Center - Hall B - Ontario, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | HE Anna | - | - | 3% | 16% | 41% | 40% | |
| 2 | HANKINS Morgan | - | - | - | 1% | 11% | 40% | 48% |
| 3 | WU Jessica | - | 1% | 9% | 32% | 47% | 11% | |
| 3 | MIYOSHI Kylie | 2% | 14% | 33% | 33% | 15% | 3% | |
| 5 | ZHAO Yanning | 1% | 9% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 6% | |
| 6 | XU Chenyu | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 33% | 11% | |
| 7 | FU Shannon | - | 5% | 19% | 35% | 31% | 10% | |
| 8 | CHEN Julia Z. | 2% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 3% | |
| 9 | WANG Aria | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 42% | 27% | |
| 10 | OPERARIO Sofia Francesca | - | 2% | 10% | 29% | 39% | 19% | |
| 11 | PROCHASKA Reagan | - | 4% | 18% | 37% | 32% | 8% | - |
| 12 | GIERAT-KATZ Izabella | 3% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 13 | LEE Adelynn | 3% | 17% | 35% | 31% | 12% | 1% | |
| 14 | DYMAR Anna | - | 3% | 16% | 36% | 35% | 11% | |
| 15 | LI Wan-Tao | 6% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 7% | 1% | |
| 16 | VIJAY Vaishnavi | 2% | 13% | 32% | 34% | 16% | 3% | |
| 17 | FISCHBEIN Quinley | 1% | 6% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 9% | |
| 18 | WANG Nicole | 1% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 4% | |
| 19 | MANDAP Alessandra | 1% | 7% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 8% | |
| 20 | DU Chloe | 2% | 12% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 3% | |
| 21 | DU Chelsea | 2% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 22 | ARULKUMAR Lashia | 5% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 1% | |
| 23 | YU Chloe | 1% | 14% | 35% | 34% | 14% | 2% | |
| 24 | LI Anna | 3% | 14% | 30% | 32% | 17% | 4% | |
| 25 | LI Allison | 12% | 33% | 35% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 26 | REN Ivanka | 4% | 21% | 37% | 29% | 9% | 1% | |
| 27 | KOU Cynthia | 12% | 34% | 34% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 28 | LI Carlie | 1% | 12% | 34% | 36% | 16% | 2% | |
| 29 | YU Jiaming | 2% | 19% | 38% | 30% | 10% | 1% | |
| 30 | CHANG Allison | 9% | 29% | 36% | 21% | 5% | - | |
| 31 | YOUSSEF Margaret | 6% | 27% | 37% | 23% | 6% | 1% | |
| 32 | RAPTIS Layla | 3% | 24% | 40% | 26% | 7% | 1% | |
| 33 | KIM Vivian | - | 5% | 19% | 35% | 31% | 10% | |
| 34 | KUO Lydia | 1% | 6% | 23% | 37% | 27% | 6% | |
| 35 | HE Elsa | 17% | 37% | 31% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
| 36 | CHO Anya | 70% | 26% | 4% | - | - | - | |
| 37 | MUKKU Emily | 12% | 34% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 38 | LI Chelsea | 15% | 36% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - | |
| 38 | ARNOLD Evangeline | 8% | 29% | 36% | 21% | 5% | - | |
| 40 | PAK Ella | - | 2% | 12% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 4% |
| 41 | MIAO Anthea | 34% | 42% | 19% | 4% | - | - | |
| 42 | YOON Claire | 2% | 24% | 40% | 26% | 7% | 1% | |
| 43 | SUN Annika | 5% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.