Ontario Convention Center - Hall B - Ontario, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | WANG Joey | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 30% |
2 | MULCAHY Sebastian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 47% |
3 | TUBALTSEV Evan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 54% | 18% |
3 | WANG Devin | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 44% | 11% | < 1% |
5 | RONG Gordon | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 24% |
6 | XUE Michael | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 33% | 6% |
7 | FU Nolan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 39% | 9% |
8 | BERTEL Florian | 100% | 96% | 79% | 47% | 18% | 4% | - |
9 | CHAN JR Jason | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 55% | 18% |
10 | LIU Xuyao | 100% | 91% | 59% | 23% | 5% | < 1% | - |
11 | DU Evan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 54% | 21% | 4% |
12 | SU Samuel | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 25% | 4% |
13 | GACIOCH Noah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 50% | 11% |
14 | ENG Kyler | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 24% | |
15 | RONG Marcus | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 25% | 4% | |
16 | WU Nathan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 33% | 4% |
17 | OBERDERFER Viktor | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 27% | 5% | < 1% |
18 | HARRIS Hayden | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 36% | 10% | 1% |
19 | MOSLEY Wally | 100% | 99% | 90% | 67% | 34% | 10% | 1% |
20 | WONG Aaron | 100% | 100% | 94% | 75% | 43% | 14% | 2% |
21 | LIU Aiden | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 40% | 10% | - |
22 | ADDLEMAN Joshua | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 49% |
23 | MA Ciel | 100% | 92% | 64% | 28% | 7% | 1% | |
24 | WHITE Ryden | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 45% | 10% |
25 | SCHWARTZMAN Ethan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 15% | 1% |
26 | TOUSSAINT Wizard | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 27% |
27 | GREENMAN Duke | 100% | 88% | 54% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
28 | VOO Lucas | 100% | 98% | 88% | 62% | 29% | 8% | 1% |
29 | HUA Nolan | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 39% | 10% | - |
30 | LEE Lucas | 100% | 83% | 46% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
31 | KIM Evan | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
32 | SRIKANTH Hariharan | 100% | 94% | 69% | 33% | 9% | 1% | |
33 | YU Brandon | 100% | 82% | 44% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
34 | WANG Lucas | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 34% | 8% | 1% |
35 | CHEN Aiden | 100% | 99% | 94% | 77% | 45% | 16% | 2% |
36 | DENG haoyu | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 76% | 34% |
37 | ZHANG Zhihan | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 26% | 5% | - |
38 | KHUSHRAJ Rohan | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
39 | SHOURIE Seth | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 26% | 6% | 1% |
40 | BALUCAN Caelus | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 27% | 5% | |
41 | LI Stephen | 100% | 100% | 95% | 79% | 48% | 17% | 3% |
42 | JAMES Kaden | 100% | 98% | 88% | 59% | 25% | 5% | - |
43 | SHOURIE Neel | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 24% | 4% | - |
44 | BALUCAN Gabriel | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 36% | 11% | 1% |
45 | WONG Alexander | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 23% | 4% | - |
46 | SHIH Derek | 100% | 95% | 73% | 37% | 11% | 2% | - |
47 | GUO Luke | 100% | 83% | 47% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
48 | SANDIRI Shanmukh Rishith | 100% | 87% | 54% | 20% | 4% | - | |
49 | DING Max | 100% | 100% | 96% | 83% | 53% | 21% | 4% |
50 | NGUYEN Ethan | 100% | 95% | 72% | 37% | 11% | 2% | - |
51 | LIN Daniel | 100% | 91% | 55% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
52 | LIU Alrik SiWei | 100% | 85% | 47% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
53 | YU Haoyun | 100% | 83% | 46% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
54 | THOMPSON Luca | 100% | 95% | 75% | 42% | 14% | 3% | - |
55 | SUN Jiarui (Jerry) | 100% | 77% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
56 | ABD ALLAH Hamza | 100% | 96% | 76% | 43% | 15% | 3% | - |
57 | FERRIERE Theo | 100% | 86% | 51% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
58 | LUO Alvin Y. | 100% | 90% | 59% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
58 | ZHANG William | 100% | 61% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
60 | ZHU Jayden | 100% | 100% | 93% | 69% | 33% | 8% | 1% |
61 | CHAN Calvin | 100% | 96% | 77% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - |
62 | CHU Clayton | 100% | 64% | 22% | 4% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.