Arlington ESports Stadium - Arlington, TX, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | SEEFELDT William Henry C. | V V V V D V | V V V V V | 5.5 | 5 | -0.5 |
| 2 | ELHUSSEINI Dylan | V D V V V | V V V V D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
| 3 | ROMANOV Ethan | V D V D V V | V V V V D | 4.7 | 4 | -0.7 |
| 3 | ZIEGLER John | V V V D V | V V V V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 5 | TAI Edison | V V D D V | V V V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 6 | MAZAHERI Fletcher | D V D V V | V V V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 7 | GONZALEZ Kian | D V D D V | V V V D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
| 8 | REAGAN Henry | D D D D V | V V V D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
| 9 | ELLISON Harper F. | V V V V V | V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
| 10 | HOWARD Paolo | V V V V V | V D | 2.5 | 5 | +2.5 |
| 11 | ELHUSSEINI Kyle | V D V D V V | V V D | 4.5 | 4 | -0.5 |
| 12 | OBREBSKI Kevin | V D D V V V | V V D | 2.3 | 4 | +1.7 |
| 13 | MEHROTRA Neel | D V V V D | V V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 14 | ZENG Andrew | V D D V D V | V V D | 4.0 | 3 | -1.0 |
| 15 | HERNDON Liam | D V D V D | V V D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
| 16 | VINOTH Aaron | V D V D D | V V D | 3.7 | 2 | -1.7 |
| 17 | CHIN Dylan A. | V V V V V V | D | 4.3 | 6 | +1.7 |
| 18 | LIU Josh | V V V V V | D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
| 19 | LIOZNYANSKY Miron | D V V V V V | D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
| 20 | BOUDREAUX James | V V V V D | V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 21 | RAO Neil | V V D V V | V D | 2.0 | 4 | +2.0 |
| 22 | LOISEAU Oscar | V V D V V D | V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 23 | KUANG Bryan | V V D V V D | V D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
| 24 | DADE MAXIMUS | D V V V D V | V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
| 25 | PARKER Isaiah | V D D V V | V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 26 | LEE DoWon | V V V D D | V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 27 | VEERAVALLI Vivek | V D V D D V | V D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
| 28 | COHEN Nathan | D V V D D | V D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 29 | SOOS Whitman | D D V D V | V D | 0.9 | 2 | +1.1 |
| 30 | LEE Nathan | V D D V D | V D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 31 | MCMAHAN Christopher D. | D D D V V D | V D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 32 | CHEN Leetyan | D D V D D | V D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
| 33 | POHL Philip | V V D V V D | D | 1.9 | 4 | +2.1 |
| 34 | LESCURE Dimitri | D V D V V | D | 1.7 | 3 | +1.3 |
| 35 | CARDENAS Lucas | V V D V D | D | 4.0 | 3 | -1.0 |
| 36 | KARIDIS-SCHNEIDER Samuel | V D V D V | D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 37 | OLSON Joseph | D V V D V | D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
| 38 | KUANG Aaron | D V V D V D | D | 4.0 | 3 | -1.0 |
| 39 | PATEL Avi | D D V V D | D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
| 40 | LI Tristan | V D D D V | D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 40 | STANTIAL Grant | D V V D D | D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 42 | PEREZ Daniel | V D D V D | D | 0.8 | 2 | +1.2 |
| 43 | JOHNSON Soren | D D V D V | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 44 | SIEDOW William | V D D V D | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 45 | DECKER Hunter | V D V D D | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 46 | DONG Haiyi | D V D D V D | D | 3.5 | 2 | -1.5 |
| 47 | NAM Nathaniel | D V D V D D | D | 1.3 | 2 | +0.7 |
| 48 | HUANG Kenneth | D V D D D | D | 3.3 | 1 | -2.3 |
| 49 | HAWLEY Justin | D D D V D | D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
| 50 | RAPALSKI Thomas | D D D V D | D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
| 51 | SATHYAN Dev | D D D D V | D | 0.5 | 1 | +0.5 |
| 52 | VAN VACTER Thomas | D D V D D D | D | 2.9 | 1 | -1.9 |
| 53 | ARMSTRONG TyLee | D D V D D D | D | 3.1 | 1 | -2.1 |
| 54 | SUNIL Rishab | D D D D V D | D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
| 55 | KOSTUSIAK Evan | V D D D D D | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 56 | DADE Augustus | D D D D D | D | 1.0 | 0 | -1.0 |
| 57 | MASSIE Jay Thomas | D D D D D D | D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.