The Fencing Center of San Jose - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | BERTHOUD Josef C. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 41% | 18% |
| 2 | PHILIPPINE Thibault N. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 41% | 21% |
| 3 | PHILIPPINE Matthias A. | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 5% |
| 3 | KHAYAT Ziad N. | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 37% | 53% |
| 5 | CAI Brian | - | - | - | - | 6% | 31% | 63% |
| 6 | MARIANI Lou | - | 2% | 9% | 25% | 34% | 24% | 7% |
| 7 | MENEGOLI Lorenzo | - | - | 2% | 15% | 38% | 34% | 10% |
| 8 | SMAY II Joseph E. | - | 3% | 16% | 33% | 33% | 14% | 1% |
| 9 | TARBUSKOVICH III John | - | 4% | 23% | 40% | 25% | 7% | 1% |
| 10 | AU Marcus J. | - | 3% | 16% | 34% | 33% | 12% | 1% |
| 11 | ZUHARS Renee A. | - | 3% | 17% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 2% |
| 12 | JEFFERIES Jonathan J. | 1% | 9% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 13 | KOERBER Christopher | 1% | 12% | 33% | 36% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 13 | LUCASEY Charles (Chuck) J. | 2% | 13% | 34% | 34% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 15 | JOSEPH Abey | 1% | 8% | 29% | 41% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 16 | PERKA Michael | - | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 42% | 23% |
| 17 | DUONG Enoch | - | 4% | 18% | 34% | 31% | 12% | 1% |
| 18 | BAUTISTA Raven S. | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 33% | 13% | 1% |
| 19 | MA Victor | 11% | 34% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 20 | BHARGAV Siddharth | 10% | 31% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 21 | GRAY Alex | - | 3% | 13% | 29% | 33% | 18% | 4% |
| 22 | LIPTON Michael D. | 1% | 7% | 28% | 39% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 23 | LUONG Allen | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 6% |
| 24 | BLOOMER Suzanne | 1% | 9% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 25 | MOHABIR Ariane | - | 11% | 31% | 34% | 18% | 5% | - |
| 26 | JOHNSON David L. | - | - | 3% | 15% | 35% | 35% | 11% |
| 27 | DJURISIC Zoran M. | 5% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 28 | LIU Chien-ye | 8% | 34% | 39% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 29 | STENNIS Brendan | 29% | 48% | 20% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 30 | BRUCE II Ommer E. | 6% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 31 | LEONARDINI Barry M. | 19% | 41% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 32 | SIMARD Ernie E. | 30% | 46% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 33 | SIMARD Sherrol A. | 24% | 46% | 26% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 34 | HOFMAN Haejung | 10% | 43% | 34% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 35 | STANICA Teodora O. | 22% | 39% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.