The Fencing Center of San Jose - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | BERTHOUD Josef C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 59% | 18% |
2 | PHILIPPINE Thibault N. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 21% |
3 | PHILIPPINE Matthias A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 31% | 5% |
3 | KHAYAT Ziad N. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 53% |
5 | CAI Brian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 63% |
6 | MARIANI Lou | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 65% | 30% | 7% |
7 | MENEGOLI Lorenzo | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 44% | 10% |
8 | SMAY II Joseph E. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 48% | 15% | 1% |
9 | TARBUSKOVICH III John | 100% | 100% | 96% | 72% | 32% | 7% | 1% |
10 | AU Marcus J. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 47% | 13% | 1% |
11 | ZUHARS Renee A. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 46% | 16% | 2% |
12 | JEFFERIES Jonathan J. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 26% | 5% | - |
13 | KOERBER Christopher | 100% | 99% | 88% | 54% | 19% | 3% | - |
13 | LUCASEY Charles (Chuck) J. | 100% | 98% | 86% | 51% | 17% | 3% | - |
15 | JOSEPH Abey | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 21% | 3% | - |
16 | PERKA Michael | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 23% |
17 | DUONG Enoch | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 44% | 14% | 1% |
18 | BAUTISTA Raven S. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 14% | 1% |
19 | MA Victor | 100% | 89% | 55% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
20 | BHARGAV Siddharth | 100% | 90% | 59% | 23% | 5% | - | - |
21 | GRAY Alex | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 55% | 22% | 4% |
22 | LIPTON Michael D. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 25% | 4% | - |
23 | LUONG Allen | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 33% | 6% |
24 | BLOOMER Suzanne | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 27% | 6% | - |
25 | MOHABIR Ariane | 100% | 100% | 89% | 57% | 23% | 5% | - |
26 | JOHNSON David L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 11% |
27 | DJURISIC Zoran M. | 100% | 95% | 72% | 35% | 10% | 1% | - |
28 | LIU Chien-ye | 100% | 92% | 58% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
29 | STENNIS Brendan | 100% | 71% | 23% | 3% | - | - | - |
30 | BRUCE II Ommer E. | 100% | 94% | 67% | 29% | 6% | 1% | - |
31 | LEONARDINI Barry M. | 100% | 81% | 40% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
32 | SIMARD Ernie E. | 100% | 70% | 24% | 4% | - | - | - |
33 | SIMARD Sherrol A. | 100% | 76% | 30% | 4% | - | - | - |
34 | HOFMAN Haejung | 100% | 90% | 47% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
35 | STANICA Teodora O. | 100% | 78% | 39% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.