La Jolla, CA - La Jolla, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | REDDY Shreya | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 29% | 6% | |
2 | CAO Stephanie X. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 23% | |
3 | MILLER Tiffany D. | 100% | 99% | 95% | 76% | 41% | 10% | |
3 | KONG Vera | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 33% |
5 | SHIN Andrea Y. | 100% | 98% | 81% | 46% | 15% | 3% | - |
6 | DESAI Maya D. | 100% | 97% | 82% | 50% | 18% | 3% | |
6 | VESTEL Mira B. | 100% | 96% | 79% | 46% | 16% | 2% | |
8 | HILL Julia W. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 32% | 7% | |
9 | DOHERTY Maverick L. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 51% | 15% | |
10 | MARSEE Samantha | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 20% | 3% | |
11 | COIMBRA Miya Y. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 39% | 10% | 1% |
12 | CHIN Erika J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 27% |
13 | LACSON Sarah | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 40% | 10% | |
14 | YAP Madeline | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 15% | 2% |
15 | ANDRES Katherine A. | 100% | 98% | 84% | 53% | 20% | 3% | |
16 | TANG Catherine H. | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 23% | 4% | |
17 | CHAN Audrey | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 53% | 19% | 3% |
17 | MOZHAEVA MARIA | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 28% | 5% |
19 | LEE Alexandra B. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 34% |
20 | SHEN Sarah | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 32% | 9% | 1% |
21 | IYER Mohini R. | 100% | 99% | 77% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - |
22 | LEE Erin Y. | 100% | 90% | 59% | 24% | 5% | - | |
23 | KONG Isabel | 100% | 97% | 79% | 46% | 15% | 2% | |
24 | DUNLAP Allison N. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 28% | 6% | |
25 | ERIKSON Kira R. | 100% | 95% | 73% | 38% | 11% | 1% | |
26 | TENG Christine Renmei | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 45% | 14% | 2% |
27 | CODY Alexandra C. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 21% | 3% |
28 | KIM Emily | 100% | 100% | 92% | 64% | 27% | 6% | - |
29 | CHOU Dana C. | 100% | 97% | 79% | 45% | 15% | 2% | |
30 | SEAL Julie T. | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 22% | 4% | |
31 | ROGERS Pauline E. | 100% | 77% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | |
32 | KIM Catherine | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 34% | 7% |
33 | XU Ellen | 100% | 96% | 77% | 42% | 13% | 2% | |
34 | GULATI Ria | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 34% | 7% | |
35 | GEYER Carolina M. | 100% | 99% | 82% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - |
36 | LAMBERT Jasmine M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 31% | 6% |
37 | ULIBARRI Nevaeh L. | 100% | 82% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - | |
38 | BUHAY Rachel T. | 100% | 98% | 86% | 59% | 26% | 6% | 1% |
39 | PLONKA Kaley V. | 100% | 92% | 50% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
40 | TOM Kristen Noelle C. | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 20% | 3% | |
41 | ABOUDAHER Janna A. | 100% | 85% | 49% | 17% | 3% | - | |
42 | PATEL Riya | 100% | 81% | 43% | 14% | 2% | - | |
43 | RAHIM Alina O. | 100% | 32% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
44 | GOMES Gisela | 100% | 21% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
45 | ORICCHIO Madeleine | 100% | 70% | 27% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.