Carmel Valley - San Diego, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
1 | SHARMA Sanil | - | - | 2% | 12% | 40% | 46% |
2 | SODERBERG Alex Z. | - | - | 2% | 16% | 42% | 39% |
3 | SMITH Justin C. | - | - | 1% | 12% | 41% | 45% |
3 | CHIEN Brandon | - | - | 5% | 24% | 44% | 27% |
5 | SINGHA Orion | - | - | 1% | 8% | 36% | 55% |
6 | MCDONALD Ethan | - | 9% | 33% | 43% | 14% | 1% |
7 | UVAROV Andrii | - | 7% | 27% | 42% | 21% | 2% |
8 | WILLIAMS Terrill D. | - | 7% | 27% | 41% | 21% | 3% |
9 | MUSGRAVE Walter N. | - | 2% | 17% | 40% | 32% | 8% |
10 | HEWITT Frank F. | 3% | 27% | 42% | 23% | 5% | - |
11 | PARK Augustine | 1% | 12% | 36% | 37% | 13% | 1% |
12 | ZAROTSKY Ronald | - | 10% | 37% | 39% | 13% | 1% |
13 | PINCHENG Yao | - | 5% | 23% | 39% | 27% | 6% |
14 | BAILEY Creston P. | - | 4% | 22% | 40% | 28% | 5% |
15 | ALEXANDER Chuck | - | - | 5% | 26% | 50% | 19% |
16 | HILLSTROM Nathan | 2% | 27% | 46% | 22% | 3% | - |
17 | MARSH Timothy G. | - | 2% | 12% | 35% | 39% | 12% |
18 | THISTLETHWAITE Doug W. | 1% | 14% | 35% | 33% | 14% | 2% |
19 | ALLEN David | 3% | 23% | 46% | 24% | 4% | - |
20 | KURITZ Marc M. | - | 2% | 12% | 36% | 40% | 10% |
21 | MARSH Janet L. | 4% | 24% | 39% | 26% | 7% | 1% |
22 | NEISINGH Isabelle | 4% | 37% | 40% | 16% | 3% | - |
23 | BACA Anthony | 70% | 26% | 4% | - | - | - |
24 | GULLY Wren | 54% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
25 | SOLONOVICH Maksim | 9% | 47% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - |
26 | DILLON Anik | 52% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
27 | HARRIS Roark S. | 2% | 22% | 42% | 27% | 7% | 1% |
28 | WIESE Michael | 3% | 23% | 43% | 25% | 5% | - |
29 | CZAPLA Dominika | 62% | 32% | 5% | - | - | - |
30 | LIANG Dong | 77% | 21% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.