Floyd Little Athletic Center - New Haven, CT, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | ZHAI Derrick | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 4.5 | 6 | +1.5 |
| 2 | XIAN kevin | D V V V V V | V V V V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
| 3 | SHARMA Ari | V V V V V D | V V V D | 3.2 | 5 | +1.8 |
| 3 | CHANG Parker | V V D V V V | V V V D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
| 5 | WANG Mendy | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.8 | 6 | +1.2 |
| 6 | GUGALA Frank | V V V V V V | V V D | 2.3 | 6 | +3.7 |
| 7 | LIU Gene | V V V V D V | V V D | 2.5 | 5 | +2.5 |
| 8 | SIU Max | V D V D V V | V V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 9 | WU Wallace | V V V V V V | V D | 4.8 | 6 | +1.2 |
| 10 | ZHONG Kingsley | D V V V V V | V D | 2.2 | 5 | +2.8 |
| 11 | ZHANG Aaron | V V V D V D | V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
| 12 | LIU Brady | V V D V V D | V D | 1.7 | 4 | +2.3 |
| 13 | ZHAO David | D V D V V D | V D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
| 14 | SONG Enoch | V V V D D D | V D | 4.0 | 3 | -1.0 |
| 15 | CAO Joshua | V D D D V D | V D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
| 16 | XIA Vincent | V V D D D D | V D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
| 17 | ZHANG Vincent | V V V D D V | D | 2.6 | 4 | +1.4 |
| 18 | SHOU Raymond | D D V V V V | D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 19 | MENZEL Lucas | D V V D V D | D | 4.0 | 3 | -1.0 |
| 20 | LIN Ziyue | D D V V D V | D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 21 | HU Michael | D D D V V V | D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 22 | ROPER Griffin | V D D V D D | D | 4.4 | 2 | -2.4 |
| 23 | ZHONG Albert | D V D D D V | D | 1.3 | 2 | +0.7 |
| 24 | CHAE Emmett | D D D V V D | D | 3.6 | 2 | -1.6 |
| 25 | LI Andrew | V D D D D V | D | 4.1 | 2 | -2.1 |
| 26 | YANG Luca | D D V D D V | D | 3.9 | 2 | -1.9 |
| 27 | WONG Blayke | D D V V D D | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 28 | CAO Aaron | V D D D D D | D | 2.9 | 1 | -1.9 |
| 29 | CHONG Cooper | D D D D V D | D | 0.7 | 1 | +0.3 |
| 30 | PUDELKO Andrew | D V D D D D | V D | 3.7 | 1 | -2.7 |
| 31 | SOBKOWIAK Dylan | D D D D D D | V D | 2.4 | 0 | -2.4 |
| 32 | SALERNO A.J. | D D D D D D | V D | 1.7 | 0 | -1.7 |
| 33 | TUCKER Maxwell | D D D V D D | D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 |
| 34 | LECH Landon | D D D D V D | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
| 35 | TUCKER Levi | D D D D D D | D | 1.8 | 0 | -1.8 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.