Floyd Little Athletic Center - New Haven, CT, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | HILD Nisha | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 36% | 54% |
2 | FESTA Carina | - | - | 2% | 12% | 34% | 38% | 14% |
3 | PAUL Lila | - | - | - | - | 5% | 30% | 65% |
3 | JEONG Katie | - | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 39% | 18% |
5 | FEIG Sela | - | - | 3% | 16% | 37% | 34% | 9% |
6 | JOHNSON Dagny L. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 43% | 25% |
6 | CALLAHAN Chase J. | - | - | - | 2% | 13% | 39% | 45% |
8 | DAI Olivia | 1% | 10% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 5% | - |
9 | JOHNSON Lydia | - | - | 2% | 16% | 46% | 36% | |
10 | MANKOVA Varvara | 1% | 6% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 10% | 1% |
11 | BUSH Bethany | - | 2% | 17% | 38% | 32% | 9% | 1% |
12 | LEE Sophia | - | - | 4% | 22% | 48% | 25% | |
13 | ZENG Sarah | - | 6% | 28% | 40% | 22% | 4% | |
14 | CHIARELLI Valentina | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 5% |
15 | CHIANG Melissa | - | 1% | 11% | 32% | 37% | 17% | 2% |
16 | MUND Ruth | - | - | 5% | 21% | 37% | 29% | 8% |
17 | TENG EMMA | 1% | 7% | 22% | 35% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
18 | NATH Trisha | - | - | - | 2% | 11% | 37% | 50% |
19 | MANSPERGER Leena | - | - | 3% | 17% | 36% | 33% | 11% |
20 | ZHANG Sophie | - | - | 4% | 19% | 40% | 32% | 5% |
20 | GUGALA Hanna | 1% | 10% | 28% | 34% | 21% | 6% | - |
22 | MALEK Zolie | - | 3% | 15% | 31% | 33% | 15% | 2% |
23 | XIAO julie | - | - | - | 2% | 15% | 42% | 41% |
24 | LIU Yifei | - | 2% | 16% | 38% | 34% | 10% | |
25 | KHAN Alissa | - | 3% | 19% | 39% | 30% | 8% | |
26 | NAYAK Esha | 1% | 6% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 10% | 1% |
27 | MONTORIO Lily M. | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 35% | 14% | 2% |
28 | HU Anna | - | 4% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
29 | LOO Kaitlyn | - | 5% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 7% | 1% |
30 | KANDADAI Lara | 5% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - |
31 | SO Catelyn | - | - | 6% | 26% | 43% | 25% | |
32 | VINOKUR Anita | 4% | 29% | 42% | 21% | 4% | - | |
33 | HAMBAZAZA Liisa | - | - | 4% | 20% | 39% | 29% | 7% |
34 | BERMAN Greta | - | 3% | 13% | 29% | 34% | 18% | 3% |
35 | SHINCHUK Ellisha | - | 4% | 20% | 38% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
36 | KALINICHENKO Yekaterina | 4% | 31% | 42% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
37 | SHMULER Fiona | 44% | 39% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
38 | MARGULIAN Maria | - | 7% | 31% | 39% | 19% | 4% | - |
39 | WOTZAK Kaia | 23% | 50% | 23% | 4% | - | - | |
40 | ATTIA Jasmine | 1% | 11% | 35% | 39% | 13% | 1% | |
41 | NAYAK Antara | 25% | 44% | 25% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
42 | ZHENG Valentina | - | 2% | 13% | 35% | 36% | 13% | 1% |
43 | HALPERIN Elizabeth H. | 9% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
44 | BROWN Aria | 26% | 45% | 24% | 5% | - | - | - |
45 | FLATT Sophia | 4% | 28% | 42% | 22% | 4% | - | |
46 | BARNES Sarah | 60% | 33% | 6% | - | - | - | |
47 | ONG Lauren | 49% | 42% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
48 | GENTILE Vittoria | 2% | 23% | 41% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - |
49 | LI Alexis | 2% | 12% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 4% | - |
50 | WU Yuwei | 2% | 12% | 29% | 33% | 19% | 5% | - |
51 | RANDALL-COLLINS Shea M. | 35% | 41% | 19% | 4% | 1% | - | - |
52 | CROOKS Riley | 4% | 23% | 41% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - |
53 | BARRY Mya | 46% | 44% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
54 | WAY Samantha | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 31% | 10% | 1% |
55 | LOPEZ-ONA Mia | 2% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 15% | 3% | - |
55 | SRINATH Lyra A. | 6% | 47% | 35% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
57 | HARRISON Allie | 74% | 24% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
58 | NEUMAN Ella | 17% | 37% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
59 | GETZONI Mary | 80% | 19% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
60 | INSINGA Ava | 27% | 50% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
60 | MURPHY Jessica | 1% | 16% | 35% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.