Floyd Little Athletic Center - New Haven, CT, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | HILD Nisha | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 54% |
2 | FESTA Carina | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 52% | 14% |
3 | PAUL Lila | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 65% |
3 | JEONG Katie | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 57% | 18% |
5 | FEIG Sela | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 44% | 9% |
6 | JOHNSON Dagny L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 25% |
6 | CALLAHAN Chase J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 45% |
8 | DAI Olivia | 100% | 99% | 88% | 60% | 26% | 6% | - |
9 | JOHNSON Lydia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 36% | |
10 | MANKOVA Varvara | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 38% | 11% | 1% |
11 | BUSH Bethany | 100% | 100% | 98% | 80% | 42% | 10% | 1% |
12 | LEE Sophia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 73% | 25% | |
13 | ZENG Sarah | 100% | 100% | 94% | 66% | 26% | 4% | |
14 | CHIARELLI Valentina | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 33% | 5% |
15 | CHIANG Melissa | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 56% | 19% | 2% |
16 | MUND Ruth | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 36% | 8% |
17 | TENG EMMA | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 35% | 9% | 1% |
18 | NATH Trisha | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 50% |
19 | MANSPERGER Leena | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 44% | 11% |
20 | ZHANG Sophie | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 37% | 5% |
20 | GUGALA Hanna | 100% | 99% | 88% | 61% | 27% | 6% | - |
22 | MALEK Zolie | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 50% | 18% | 2% |
23 | XIAO julie | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 41% |
24 | LIU Yifei | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 44% | 10% | |
25 | KHAN Alissa | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 38% | 8% | |
26 | NAYAK Esha | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 38% | 11% | 1% |
27 | MONTORIO Lily M. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 16% | 2% |
28 | HU Anna | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 34% | 9% | 1% |
29 | LOO Kaitlyn | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 33% | 8% | 1% |
30 | KANDADAI Lara | 100% | 95% | 75% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - |
31 | SO Catelyn | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 68% | 25% | |
32 | VINOKUR Anita | 100% | 96% | 67% | 25% | 4% | - | |
33 | HAMBAZAZA Liisa | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 36% | 7% |
34 | BERMAN Greta | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 55% | 21% | 3% |
35 | SHINCHUK Ellisha | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 38% | 10% | 1% |
36 | KALINICHENKO Yekaterina | 100% | 96% | 65% | 24% | 4% | - | - |
37 | SHMULER Fiona | 100% | 56% | 16% | 3% | - | - | - |
38 | MARGULIAN Maria | 100% | 100% | 93% | 62% | 23% | 4% | - |
39 | WOTZAK Kaia | 100% | 77% | 27% | 4% | - | - | |
40 | ATTIA Jasmine | 100% | 99% | 88% | 53% | 15% | 1% | |
41 | NAYAK Antara | 100% | 75% | 31% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
42 | ZHENG Valentina | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 50% | 14% | 1% |
43 | HALPERIN Elizabeth H. | 100% | 91% | 61% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
44 | BROWN Aria | 100% | 74% | 29% | 5% | - | - | - |
45 | FLATT Sophia | 100% | 96% | 68% | 26% | 4% | - | |
46 | BARNES Sarah | 100% | 40% | 7% | - | - | - | |
47 | ONG Lauren | 100% | 51% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
48 | GENTILE Vittoria | 100% | 98% | 75% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - |
49 | LI Alexis | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 23% | 5% | - |
50 | WU Yuwei | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 23% | 5% | - |
51 | RANDALL-COLLINS Shea M. | 100% | 65% | 24% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
52 | CROOKS Riley | 100% | 96% | 73% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - |
53 | BARRY Mya | 100% | 54% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
54 | WAY Samantha | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 42% | 11% | 1% |
55 | LOPEZ-ONA Mia | 100% | 98% | 82% | 50% | 18% | 3% | - |
55 | SRINATH Lyra A. | 100% | 94% | 47% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
57 | HARRISON Allie | 100% | 26% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
58 | NEUMAN Ella | 100% | 83% | 46% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
59 | GETZONI Mary | 100% | 20% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
60 | INSINGA Ava | 100% | 73% | 23% | 3% | - | - | - |
60 | MURPHY Jessica | 100% | 99% | 83% | 48% | 17% | 3% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.