Alliance fencing Academy - Houston, TX, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | PHAM Sawyer T. | - | - | 6% | 30% | 47% | 17% | |
| 2 | FRAY Alexander | - | - | - | - | 1% | 15% | 84% |
| 3 | IMREK Elijah S. | - | - | 2% | 17% | 49% | 32% | |
| 3 | ELHUSSEINI Dylan | - | - | 2% | 12% | 39% | 42% | 4% |
| 5 | MCALISTER Ian | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 37% | 15% | |
| 6 | THOMAS Harris | - | 3% | 20% | 44% | 33% | ||
| 7 | SANCHEZ Emanuel | - | - | 2% | 13% | 35% | 38% | 12% |
| 8 | NEAL John P. | - | - | 1% | 11% | 42% | 46% | |
| 9 | SEEFELDT William Henry C. | - | - | 1% | 13% | 42% | 44% | |
| 10 | ZHU Eric | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 38% | 21% | 4% |
| 11 | CARDENAS Lucas | 1% | 17% | 45% | 31% | 6% | - | |
| 12 | CHIN Dylan A. | 2% | 19% | 41% | 31% | 7% | ||
| 13 | KHANNA Nikhil | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 43% | 37% |
| 14 | SEBASTIAN Alexander P. | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 44% | 18% | 1% |
| 15 | ESKRIDGE Caleb | 1% | 5% | 20% | 36% | 30% | 9% | |
| 16 | ROMANOV Ethan | - | 3% | 24% | 45% | 24% | 3% | |
| 17 | MUGA Aiden | 1% | 12% | 36% | 38% | 12% | ||
| 18 | BARG Jonathan | - | 2% | 12% | 38% | 38% | 10% | |
| 19 | SENNEWALD Frederick A. | - | - | 1% | 13% | 47% | 38% | |
| 20 | ELHUSSEINI Kyle | - | 8% | 34% | 43% | 14% | 1% | |
| 21 | ROBLEDO Matthew | 19% | 41% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 22 | POHL Philip | 11% | 53% | 30% | 5% | - | - | |
| 23 | HOWARD Paolo | 3% | 18% | 38% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 24 | EMMERT JP | 3% | 18% | 35% | 31% | 12% | 2% | |
| 25 | XIAO andrew | - | 2% | 15% | 41% | 34% | 7% | |
| 26 | HERNDON Liam | 1% | 14% | 45% | 32% | 7% | 1% | |
| 27 | ESHONKULOV Aziz | 5% | 23% | 39% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 28 | LESCURE Dimitri | 47% | 40% | 11% | 1% | - | ||
| 29 | SURESH NEERAJ | 2% | 14% | 33% | 34% | 14% | 2% | |
| 30 | COHEN Nathan | 8% | 48% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 31 | SCEROLER Anslee | 28% | 43% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 32 | VINOTH Aaron | 10% | 39% | 37% | 13% | 1% | ||
| 33 | RAO Neil | 8% | 29% | 37% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 34 | BARTON Christian | 35% | 44% | 18% | 3% | - | - | |
| 35 | XIONG Aaron | 3% | 20% | 46% | 26% | 5% | - | |
| 36 | WILLIAMS Nasir | 6% | 22% | 35% | 26% | 10% | 1% | |
| 37 | DADE MAXIMUS | 3% | 17% | 34% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 38 | DECKER Hunter | 7% | 27% | 37% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 39 | RICE Timothy | 27% | 52% | 19% | 2% | - | - | |
| 40 | PEREZ Daniel | 72% | 25% | 3% | - | - | - | |
| 41 | OLSON Joseph | 10% | 35% | 37% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 42 | VEERAVALLI Vivek | 19% | 39% | 30% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 43 | DADE Augustus | 73% | 25% | 2% | - | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.