Golisano Training Center at Nazareth University - Rochester, NY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
1 | LAI Boden | - | - | 3% | 18% | 42% | 37% |
2 | SAVORETTI Francesco | - | - | 1% | 8% | 36% | 54% |
3 | BOUDREAUX James | - | 4% | 19% | 39% | 31% | 6% |
3 | XIAO Yichen | - | - | 1% | 9% | 37% | 53% |
5 | DURKIN Tristan E. | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 42% | 22% |
6 | KANG Eunchan | 26% | 41% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
7 | KARIMOV Amir | 22% | 40% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - |
8 | SINGLETON Aman | 3% | 17% | 35% | 32% | 12% | 1% |
9 | MIDYANY Evan | 3% | 16% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 2% |
10 | LIN Zizhen | 4% | 25% | 40% | 25% | 6% | - |
11 | LEE Aiden | 5% | 25% | 39% | 24% | 6% | 1% |
12 | JIANG Matthew | 1% | 8% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 4% |
13 | BAJAJ Nakul | 4% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
14 | TU Jinqi | 7% | 29% | 38% | 21% | 5% | - |
15 | BRADSHAW Carter | 2% | 19% | 40% | 30% | 8% | 1% |
16 | MAZAHERI Fletcher | 5% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 7% | - |
17 | LIU Adam | 1% | 9% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 4% |
18 | DOUBOV Andrew | 1% | 9% | 29% | 38% | 20% | 3% |
19 | SAVORETTI Pietro | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 41% | 18% |
20 | KE Sebastian | 6% | 31% | 40% | 19% | 3% | - |
21 | XU Che | 4% | 23% | 39% | 26% | 7% | - |
22 | MODANLOU Navid | 1% | 11% | 31% | 37% | 17% | 2% |
23 | IPPOLITO-JOHN Matteo | 2% | 13% | 30% | 33% | 18% | 4% |
24 | FORTUNE William | 2% | 17% | 36% | 31% | 12% | 2% |
25 | LIANG Yi-po(Ryder) | - | 1% | 11% | 38% | 38% | 11% |
26 | TRAN Spencer | 1% | 11% | 33% | 37% | 16% | 2% |
27 | NOVAK Samuel | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 38% | 18% |
28 | NAM Nathaniel | 39% | 42% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
29 | CINCOTTA Reeve | 55% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
29 | ALAM Rajan | 51% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.