JMU University Rec Center - Harrisonburg, VA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | RAUSCHER Ryan | - | 1% | 12% | 36% | 39% | 10% | |
2 | PATRICK Timothy M. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 43% | 24% |
3 | LE TAN | - | 1% | 10% | 35% | 37% | 15% | 2% |
3 | FENKER William M. | - | - | 2% | 10% | 29% | 39% | 19% |
5 | STAM August M. | - | - | 2% | 16% | 38% | 34% | 9% |
6 | CASSIDY Connor J. | - | 11% | 40% | 34% | 12% | 2% | - |
7 | PAGAN Andrew | 1% | 8% | 23% | 34% | 25% | 9% | 1% |
8 | CHAMBERS Thomas J. | - | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 37% | 18% |
9 | ABU-AJAJ Mohamed | - | 4% | 19% | 38% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
10 | SUTHERLAND Jr. Richard L. | - | - | 2% | 17% | 39% | 33% | 9% |
11 | REEDER Nicholas W. | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 3% |
12 | JACKSON Evan | 20% | 53% | 23% | 4% | - | - | |
13 | FEIRA Justin | 1% | 14% | 40% | 36% | 8% | 1% | |
14 | LAUDO Joseph | 4% | 18% | 33% | 29% | 13% | 3% | - |
15 | SULLIVAN Anna | 2% | 39% | 40% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
16 | SEMP Brannon A. | - | 2% | 12% | 39% | 37% | 10% | |
17 | GOSALIA Nidhi | 6% | 23% | 34% | 25% | 10% | 2% | - |
18 | NI Hao | - | 3% | 16% | 37% | 34% | 9% | - |
19 | OHASHI Jax | 2% | 18% | 46% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
20 | OLMEN Kelsey | 24% | 40% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - | |
21 | MAY Matthew | - | 3% | 14% | 34% | 36% | 13% | |
22 | COURTER Cameron | - | < 1% | 2% | 12% | 31% | 38% | 16% |
23 | MEARS Caleb | 1% | 8% | 23% | 33% | 24% | 9% | 1% |
24 | PETERS Ella | 29% | 43% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
25 | TUSING Isabel | 6% | 59% | 29% | 5% | - | - | - |
26 | ZHANG Yulang | 4% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 10% | 1% | - |
27 | BARR Corinne | 67% | 29% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.